Readify

Deborah’s father’s cognitive impairment

Unorthodox: The Scandalous Rejection of My Hasidic Roots

Deborah’s father’s cognitive impairment is never settled into a single confirmed diagnosis. Instead, it emerges through competing family accounts and the everyday consequences of his difficulty caring for himself, holding ordinary work, and behaving in ways others consider appropriate. Deborah recalls shame, while her mother recalls trying to care for him; Bubby continues to feed and shelter him. Together, these perspectives show a man whose limitations are real but whose needs are met unevenly, often through family labor or work offered out of pity.

Identity and Uncertain Diagnosis

Deborah remembers her father as shabby and dirty, with behavior she describes as childlike and inappropriate. Her dominant childhood feeling toward him is shame. That recollection is not the same as a diagnosis, and the family’s later discussion does not produce certainty. Her mother suggests that he may be delusional or mentally ill, then recalls that a psychiatrist saw him once after their marriage. The psychiatrist reportedly suspected a personality disorder, but could not determine more because Deborah’s father refused further testing and did not return for treatment.

Deborah introduces a different account from Aunt Chaya: her father had supposedly been diagnosed as a child with an intellectual disability, with an IQ of sixty-six. The figure is precise, but its status in the conversation remains that of a family report rather than a documented assessment presented to the reader. The possibilities raised by the mother and daughter therefore remain unresolved. Deborah’s mother insists that treatment could still have been attempted, even if his difficulties could not simply be removed. The disagreement exposes a distinction between naming his condition and asking what care he might have received.

Daily Life and Limited Independence

His difficulties appear in the concrete routines of adult life. Deborah says that other people hire him out of pity to drive them or deliver packages, choosing tasks they think he can manage without making mistakes. He does not understand that the employment is charitable; he believes he is providing a valuable service. The gap between how he understands his work and how others regard it leaves him vulnerable to being treated as useful only within narrow limits.

His daughter sees a similar mixture of effort and dependence in his attempts to father her. When he visits her at Bubby’s house, he sometimes brings Klein’s chocolate-dipped ice cream bars and waits for her appreciative response. Deborah recognizes that he may regard supplying treats as the work of being a father. The gesture offers one of their few good moments, but it does not create dependable care: after arriving, he leaves suddenly on another errand. His shirts remain stained despite Bubby doing much of his laundry, and Deborah says he cannot be relied upon to look after her.

Other details make his limitations harder to romanticize. As an adult, he hoards cake for months until it smells moldy, and keeps bottles of pink liquid antibiotics in the refrigerator, drinking them daily for an illness no doctor can detect. The account does not explain the origin of these habits or assign them a specific diagnosis. It presents them as troubling features of his life, visible to the family and difficult to interpret. Their force lies in the contrast between his ordinary needs and the odd, self-directed ways he tries to manage them.

Family Care, Shame, and Exclusion

Bubby’s care for her son persists into adulthood. She cooks beef especially for him, although Zeidy avoids beef after a scandal in which some kosher meat proved not to be kosher. She continues to cook for her married sons as well, and Deborah eats and sleeps at Bubby’s house because her mother is often absent and her father cannot be depended on to care for her. The kitchen routine makes care tangible: food is prepared, the counters are wiped at ten each night, and Bubby jokes that the family restaurant is closed. Her household supports both her son and her granddaughter, though it does not erase the instability in either relationship.

Deborah’s mother describes a different period of care. She says she made her husband look neat because he could not manage that himself, hoping to make him presentable and spare the family some shame. At first, his relatives were grateful that he had married. After the initial fuss passed, however, they began to leave her out and look down on her because she came from a poor family. She says that neither she nor her husband could earn money, so Zeidy supported them while counting out only the bare minimum for groceries. Her account places the couple’s financial dependence alongside the social isolation Deborah remembers among her aunts. The father’s impairment is therefore bound up with class and family standing, not only with his individual behavior.

Childhood, Discipline, and Narrative Significance

Bubby remembers Deborah’s father as a thin, mischievous child who needed coaxing to eat. In one story, he tied a chicken drumstick to a string and lowered it out the window to feed the cats rather than remain at the table. He later showed Bubby an empty plate, but had not thought to retrieve the string and put the gnawed bones back. Deborah initially admires the ingenuity, then feels her pride collapse when she realizes how incomplete the plan was. The anecdote holds affection and limitation together: Bubby’s memory preserves a lovable child, while Deborah notices the failure of foresight.

By adolescence, the behavior that Bubby could tell as innocent mischief no longer seemed charming to the adults responsible for him. Because he could not sit still in yeshiva, Zeidy sent him to Gershom Feldman’s boot camp in upstate New York, a yeshiva for troublesome boys where misbehavior brought beatings. Deborah says the punishment did not cure his strange behavior. The episode offers no account of what support or assessment he received there; instead, it shows discipline being used against behavior that persisted afterward.

The narrative does not reduce Deborah’s father to either a diagnosis or a moral failing. Deborah’s shame, her mother’s account of care and exclusion, and Bubby’s sustaining routines give different angles on the same life, while the uncertainty around diagnosis remains intact. His cognitive impairment matters not as a complete explanation for every action, but as part of the conditions under which he worked, depended on relatives, and failed to provide reliable care for his daughter. The sweets he brings, the errands he believes are valuable, and the family members who continue to feed him make that dependence intimate and concrete.