“Merricat, said Connie” rhyme
We Have Always Lived in the CastleThe “Merricat, said Connie” rhyme is a short, recurring verbal pattern associated with Mary Katherine Blackwood and Constance Blackwood. It begins in Mary Katherine’s imagination as a private exchange, but the words become available to children and villagers as a means of mockery. After the Blackwood house is damaged, the refrain persists in a different register: a boy recites it at the house and then flees, while his family leaves eggs and an apology. The rhyme’s importance lies in that change of audience and use. The same recognizable words can express imagined intimacy, public cruelty, or a cautious attempt to approach the sisters.
Form and Private Repetition
In Mary Katherine’s imagined version, Constance asks whether Mary Katherine would like tea, and Mary Katherine answers by anticipating poison. Constance then asks whether she would like to sleep, and Mary Katherine answers with the line about being ten feet deep in the boneyard. The exchange has the compact structure of a call and response: a domestic invitation is followed by an answer that overturns its comfort with a reference to danger and death. Its singable, repetitive form makes the contrast memorable without requiring a long explanation.
The scene places the rhyme inside Mary Katherine’s effort to withstand the children gathered near the Harris boys’ yard. She has groceries and could take another route home, but chooses to continue past the fence. As the children call her name, she imagines living on the moon and speaking a different language. Against that inward refuge, the rhyme supplies a private script: the imagined voices of the sisters replace, for a moment, the voices directed at Mary Katherine from outside. The refrain does not change what the children are doing, but it gives the encounter an alternative verbal pattern—one belonging, in her mind, to the sisters rather than to the crowd.
Children’s Taunt and Village Performance
The rhyme’s domestic opening makes it especially effective as a taunt. The children call Mary Katherine’s name in a group, and Mary Katherine imagines that their parents have carefully taught them how to deliver the words. That thought is presented as her speculation, not as a confirmed account of the children’s instruction. The episode does show an adult on a porch laughing as the children shout; another adult tells children not to approach the fence or call names, but Mary Katherine continues on while the shouting carries on. The refrain therefore belongs not only to the children’s voices but to a village scene in which adult responses are divided between reprimand and amusement.
The words also connect ordinary teasing to the history surrounding the sisters. Mary Katherine imagines poison in the tea invitation and burial in the sleeping response, so the rhyme compresses the threatening associations attached to the Blackwood family into a form children can repeat. When villagers later damage the house, someone begins the tea line through the laughter. Mary Katherine hears the rhythm as insistent and wishes to be on the moon; then dishes break nearby, and she and Constance find that the crowd is approaching the dining-room windows. The refrain has crossed from the children’s encounter at the fence into the violence of the house’s public assault. Its recurrence links two scenes without making their circumstances identical: first a group of children calls to Mary Katherine on the road; later the words sound amid the destruction of the family home.
After the House Is Ruined
Afterward, the rhyme survives as part of the children’s knowledge of the ruined house. They warn one another not to go onto its steps because the ladies will get them. On one occasion, a boy, dared by the others, stands at the foot of the steps, calls out the tea line shakily, and runs away with the rest. The children’s performance has changed: the earlier taunt is now mixed with the fear attached to approaching the house. The refrain remains recognizable, but its delivery is no longer simply a confident group calling across a fence.
That encounter produces a small, concrete response. During the night, the sisters find a basket of fresh eggs on the doorsill with a note saying, “He didn’t mean it, please.” Constance puts the eggs into a bowl for the cooler and pities the boy, imagining that he may be hiding under a bed. Mary Katherine suggests that he may have been punished to teach him manners. The episode does not establish that the children have stopped fearing or mocking the sisters; instead, it shows a single act of apology following the boy’s recitation. The rhyme is thus part of a continuing boundary between the house and the village, but the note and food cross that boundary in a quieter way.
Narrative Significance
Across these scenes, the refrain works through repetition and changing performance rather than through a stable, single meaning. In Mary Katherine’s inward version, it is shaped as an exchange between sisters and gives her a private language while she passes a hostile audience. In the village, children use it to single her out, and the crowd later repeats it amid the destruction of the home. At the ruined house, a frightened boy repeats it under pressure from his companions, and an apology follows. The shift from imagined intimacy to public taunt to uneasy approach makes the rhyme a record of how the sisters’ story circulates beyond their control.
Its simple question-and-answer pattern also exposes the difference between the household’s domestic gestures and the hostility surrounding it. Tea and sleep ordinarily suggest care and rest; here, the answers turn those invitations toward poison and burial. The line can therefore preserve the sisters’ private bond while being taken up by outsiders who use it against them. By returning in distinct settings, the rhyme becomes more than a remembered couplet: it is a portable piece of village speech, carrying the sisters’ isolation into the street, the damaged house, and the children’s later warnings.
