Jo’s guilt over Darren Clements’s death
Blow OutJo’s guilt over Darren Clements’s death is the unresolved emotional consequence of a police operation that ends with Clements dying on the M60. Although colleagues argue that she cannot be blamed for the collision, Jo remains fixed on the fact that her pursuit brought her into the moment of his death, and on the look he gave her as he turned toward the shouts. Her response makes the ending more than an operational success: it becomes a personal burden that survives the immediate crisis.
The collision and Jo’s response
During the flight from police, Clements crossed into the motorway lanes. A car veered into the fast lane, another struck the central barrier, and the next car hit Clements, throwing him onto its windshield and into the path of a tanker. The control room witnessed the collision on its screens. Jo, watching with the others, switched off her radio, struggled to steady herself, and retched. The incident’s mediated view did not make it distant: the live operation became a death she had to confront in real time.
The collision follows Jo’s shout for Clements to stop. He turned to look back, and that brief interruption in his flight coincided with the sequence that brought him into the path of the cars. Jo’s later understanding of that moment is shaped by this proximity: she cannot separate the call to stop him from the fatal outcome that followed, even though the collision itself involved the movements of traffic on the motorway.
The argument over responsibility
In the first debriefing, Gordon tells Jo that the death was not her fault. He distinguishes the incident from a pursuit in the technical sense and insists that nobody blames her. His reassurance is careful and direct, but it cannot displace her own account of causation. Jo holds onto the counterfactual that if she had not chased Clements onto the motorway, he would still be alive.
Nick offers the other side of the moral ledger: Clements had already killed three people and wounded another, and Jo’s actions had prevented him from killing Henry Mwamba. Jo adds Carly Whittle to the recognition of those who helped. These facts explain why the pursuit mattered and why colleagues defend Jo; they do not erase the death in her mind. The tension is not simply between guilt and innocence, but between the consequences that make the operation necessary and the irreversible outcome of carrying it out.
The memory that remains
Jo’s distress persists beyond the collision. She is haunted by Clements’s expression just before he died, and she interprets his turn not as an attempt to put himself in danger but as an instinctive response to locate the voices calling after him. In her account, that pause slowed him enough to determine what happened next. She expects the image to return at night and on waking in the early hours for weeks rather than days. The persistence of that remembered look gives her guilt a specific focus: not an abstract judgment about police work, but a replayed instant whose meaning she cannot settle.
Institutional and public aftermath
Clements’s death triggers an investigation into the police operation as well as Jo’s private reckoning. The Independent Police Complaints Commission is already involved, and the team must prepare an internal review and agree a press release. The formal processes establish that the death carries consequences beyond the immediate operation; they do not provide Jo with the relief her colleagues’ assurances fail to bring.
Later, Jo questions what the work is for. When Henry Mwamba credits God with protecting him, she points instead to the police and the National Crime Agency, and to Carly’s role in saving him. Yet public recognition is not what sustains her. She admits that at times she wonders why she does the job, and Agata answers by naming those it serves: the people endangered or harmed, including Mwamba, Melissa, and Sarah Weston, as well as the coroner. Jo’s guilt is therefore left alongside a reason to continue, not resolved by it. The episode holds both truths together: the work can protect lives, and its necessary actions can leave its officers carrying the death that followed.


