Henry VI
Common SenseHenry VI is presented not through a personal biography but as a ruler caught in the contest between the houses of York and Lancaster. In Thomas Paine’s account, his repeated reversals of power exemplify the instability of hereditary monarchy: dynastic claims turned the succession into a decades-long conflict, and the country’s political institutions followed whichever side held strength.
Place in Paine’s Argument
Paine invokes Henry VI while rejecting the claim that hereditary succession preserves a nation from civil war. He counters that defense with England’s record of wars and rebellions, then makes the York–Lancaster conflict his principal example of succession producing, rather than preventing, disorder. Henry’s reign supplies the setting for a contest Paine treats as rooted in personal and dynastic claims rather than a public interest capable of settling the dispute.
Reversals in the York–Lancaster Contest
Paine describes twelve pitched battles, in addition to skirmishes and sieges, between Henry and Edward IV. Their fortunes repeatedly changed: Henry was twice a prisoner of Edward, while Edward was also taken prisoner by Henry. The reversals carried each man between sharply different positions—Henry from prison to a palace, Edward from a palace into exile abroad—and then turned again, as Henry was driven from the throne and Edward recalled to succeed him.
The sequence makes political authority appear contingent on the changing outcome of conflict. Paine adds that Parliament followed the stronger side, depicting it as responsive to shifts in power rather than as an independent force resolving the competing claims. Henry’s repeated displacement is therefore part of a broader account of instability, in which possession of the crown changes hands without ending the underlying contest.
Duration and Resolution
Paine dates the conflict from the reign of Henry VI and says it was not fully extinguished until the reign of Henry VII, when the rival families were united. He gives its span as 67 years, from 1422 to 1489. Henry’s part in the struggle thus belongs to a dynastic conflict that outlasted the immediate reversals between him and Edward IV; in Paine’s telling, it ended not through the hereditary principle securing an undisputed succession, but through the eventual union of the families.
Narrative and Political Significance
Henry VI functions as an example in a polemical historical argument, not as a character whose motives or private life the text explores. Paine compresses a long conflict into a sequence of captures, escapes from power, and renewed displacement, using those reversals to show how uncertain succession can make a nation’s government. The account supports his larger claim that monarchy and hereditary succession have brought political communities into prolonged conflict, rather than reliably protecting them from it.
