Readify

Robert Jordan and Karkov’s friendship

For Whom the Bell Tolls

Robert Jordan and Karkov’s friendship joins private affection to a hard education in wartime politics. Jordan first dislikes the luxurious Madrid hotel where they meet, but comes to value Karkov’s intelligence, insolence, and humor; Karkov, in turn, respects Jordan’s writing and urges him to understand the forces behind the war. Recalled while Jordan faces the bridge mission, their conversations make a hoped-for return to Madrid feel both imaginable and uncertain.

An Unpromising Introduction

Jordan’s first visit to Gaylord’s comes through Kashkin, who thinks Karkov wants to meet Americans and introduces the two men. The hotel itself repels Jordan: in a besieged city its food seems too good, its comforts indecently luxurious, and its conversation too cynical. Karkov initially meets him with insulting politeness. The change comes when Jordan tells a genuinely funny story at his own expense rather than performing the role of a hero. Karkov responds with relieved rudeness and then outright insolence; the two become friends through a shared willingness to drop the expected pose.

Karkov’s appearance had contributed to Jordan’s first misjudgment. In riding boots, gray breeches, and a gray tunic, with tiny hands and feet and a puffily fragile face and body, he seemed almost comic. His manner of speaking through bad teeth, including a habit of spitting his words, was hardly an invitation to easy admiration. Yet Jordan comes to regard him as the most intelligent man he has ever met, possessing unusual inner dignity, an insolence that is part of his humor, and an ability to see through appearances.

Candor and Political Education

The friendship takes shape in the long conversations Jordan remembers from the hotel. Karkov reads Jordan’s little-published book about Spain and praises its truthfulness: he says that this is why he takes the trouble with Jordan and wants him to know certain things. Jordan has spent ten years travelling through Spain by foot, train, bus, horse, mule, and truck, and understands that he has added little to the work of earlier writers. Karkov’s approval matters not because the book has succeeded commercially—it has not—but because he recognizes an honesty Jordan wants to preserve. Jordan resolves that, if he gets through the war, he will write about what he truly knows, though the things he has learned in Spain are more difficult than his earlier subject.

Karkov’s instruction is practical as well as literary. When Jordan objects to the way Spanish government money is distributed, saying that it belongs to the Spanish workers, Karkov tells him that he is not supposed to like things, but to understand them. He presents each meeting as another lesson and jokes that Jordan, a professor, will eventually acquire an education. Jordan fears that his political associations may make it impossible to return to academic life in America; Karkov suggests that he might instead continue his studies in the Soviet Union. Their exchange reveals both their differences and their intimacy: Jordan can protest what he sees as an injustice, while Karkov insists that political judgment requires knowledge of how power actually works.

Karkov also makes the war’s reciprocal violence explicit. He tells Jordan that each side must have its own people behind enemy lines, just as the other side finds and shoots theirs, and warns him to remember how many agents the enemy must send into Republican territory. Jordan has already thought about them. Karkov ends the conversation by sending him away to finish the pitcher of beer because he has to go upstairs to see people. Jordan’s recollection of being told to come back soon gives the friendship a continuing, ordinary rhythm amid the work of war: lessons, beer, and the expectation of another visit.

A Friendship Set Against the War

The hotel’s political talk first strikes Jordan as cynical, and its comforts seem out of place in a besieged city. Over time, he revises both judgments. He comes to accept and enjoy the food and beer, reasoning that people representing a power governing a sixth of the world may have some comforts. More importantly, Karkov’s bleak observations no longer seem like mere cynicism. Jordan concludes that the talk he had once disliked has proved too true. Their friendship therefore does not erase Jordan’s moral discomfort; it teaches him to hold that discomfort alongside a sharper understanding of how wartime power operates.

Their discussions extend beyond Jordan’s book and political education. Jordan remembers Karkov speaking about an American figure whose courage at Toledo had helped the siege of the Alcazar, and then puncturing the figure’s reputation by describing the persuasive face and manner that made him seem like a trusted conspirator. The episode gives Jordan another lesson in the distance between public image and political reality. Karkov can admire a man’s earlier bravery while also exposing the machinery of reputation and influence around him. Jordan listens, questions, and learns without surrendering his own judgments.

Karkov’s regard for Jordan is particularly striking because the book has reached very few readers: Jordan doubts that even two thousand people have read it. Its value to Karkov lies instead in the quality of its attention to Spain. In that respect, the friendship joins companionship to recognition. Karkov sees a writer capable of telling the truth; Jordan sees a political observer whose hard lessons make the war more intelligible, even when they complicate his own ideals.

Madrid as a Possible Return

While carrying out the bridge mission, Jordan imagines what he might do if he survives and gets back to the lines. He hopes to ask for two or three days in Madrid, although he knows that no one has leave in this war. His plan includes buying books, taking a hot bath at the Florida Hotel, reading in bed, and drinking absinthe. Afterward he wants to visit Gaylord’s, where the food and beer are better, and find out from Karkov what is happening in the war. The fantasy is precise enough to feel like a life: not a grand escape, but a room, books, a drink, a meal, and a conversation with a friend.

Jordan’s imagined return has to change when he thinks of Maria. The plan he had formed before she entered his life can no longer be treated as a solitary holiday. He imagines taking two rooms so she can rest at the hotel while he goes to Gaylord’s, then returning to her; perhaps, after telling Karkov about her, he could bring her to meet him. Even the proposed three days in Madrid acquire a shared shape. Karkov’s place in Jordan’s future is thus not merely professional or political: Jordan imagines introducing him to the woman he loves.

The hope remains shadowed by the bridge operation and by Jordan’s recognition that the route back may be long. He thinks of this future as something to tell Karkov when the operation is over, then repeats the condition that governs every part of the plan: when it is over. The friendship makes survival concrete, but cannot guarantee it. Madrid, the hotel, and another conversation remain a possible destination held against the immediate demands of the mission.