Readify

Rabbits

Journey to the End of the Night

Rabbits are both routine laboratory specimens and the apparent purpose of a rabbit hutch commissioned by the Henrouilles. In the Institute, their remains are preserved and reused under a regime of extreme thrift; in the Henrouille plot, three live rabbits provide cover for an explosive trap intended for Grandma Henrouille. The contrast turns an unremarkable animal into a measure of the book’s wider world, where economy and convenience repeatedly make living beings disposable.

Laboratory Specimens

At the research institute, a rabbit’s remains occupy a permanent place in a researcher’s compartment. The methodical scientist pauses to look at the decaying viscera, and a replacement animal is sacrificed only when the smell becomes intolerable. Professor Jaunisset, the Institute’s Secretary General, insists on such thrift that the remains yield what the narration calls unbelievable by-products and derivatives. The specimen is not simply an object of study: its prolonged use is a small, grotesque emblem of an institution that economizes on everything, including the dignity of its work.

The laboratory’s daily routine makes that economy visible in practical detail. Technicians become accustomed to the smell of decomposition; some use the Bunsen burners to cook meals, while researchers inspect the animals, smoke, and return the putrefying material to a ramshackle incubator cabinet at five o’clock. The animals’ scientific function is thus entangled with boredom, makeshift work, and the staff’s effort to get through the day. The rabbit remains in the room not as evidence of scientific progress, but as part of a cycle sustained by habit and scarcity.

The Henrouille Rabbit Hutch

The rabbits return in a different setting when Robinson tells Ferdinand Bardamu that he is building a hutch for the Henrouilles. He explains that the household has three rabbits, to be kept in the small yard where the old woman lives. The late hour and the commission strike Bardamu as suspicious. Robinson says the work is his wife’s idea and stresses that the family will pay him; pressed about the arrangement, he changes the subject before fully explaining it.

Robinson eventually admits that the hutch is only the visible part of a larger scheme. He says he is building what the Henrouilles requested, while the fireworks and what follows are for the family to handle. His payment includes money for the wood, for his labor, and for the idea, with the prospect of further earnings if the story succeeds. The rabbits lend the arrangement an ordinary domestic appearance, while the hutch is being prepared as part of a plan against the old woman.

A Trap Disguised as Accident

The family’s intended sequence is specific: Grandma Henrouille will be sent to feed the rabbits, and fireworks attached to the hutch door will be set off when she touches it. The Henrouilles expect the explosion to kill her, while the neighborhood’s belief that she is mad will help make the result seem unsurprising. They plan to say that they had warned her to stay away from the rabbits and that she disobeyed. The animals’ presence is essential to the planned pretext: the hutch makes the danger appear to belong to an ordinary household task rather than a deliberate attack.

The scheme fails when a rabbit moves as Robinson is fastening the fireworks to the door. The device goes off before the intended moment and injures Robinson’s eyes; Grandma Henrouille, watching from her shack, later recounts that she had seen him at work. She tells Bardamu that the contraption was loaded with buckshot and describes the mishap as the consequence of a man plotting murder. The rabbit’s movement is a small, accidental interruption, but it overturns the planned roles: the intended victim survives, while the conspirator becomes the one harmed by the device.

Function and Significance

Across these episodes, rabbits are never given an independent perspective; their significance comes through the human systems that use them. At the Institute, they are specimens whose remains are stretched to satisfy institutional thrift. At the Henrouille home, three living rabbits are made the ostensible reason for a hutch that conceals a murder plan. In both contexts, routine provides cover for exploitation: laboratory custom normalizes the treatment of animals as material, while a familiar domestic arrangement is meant to disguise violence against a person.

The recurrence also links the novel’s satire of scientific procedure to its account of poverty and self-interest. The laboratory’s decaying specimen and the hutch’s three rabbits belong to radically different scenes, yet both are caught in economies where the vulnerable are treated as usable resources. The failed trap makes that pattern abruptly unstable. A rabbit’s movement disrupts Robinson’s careful construction, and the device meant to remove Grandma Henrouille instead exposes the conspiracy and leaves Robinson blind. The animals remain incidental to the human plot, but their material presence is what gives its plans both their apparent plausibility and their unforeseen failure.