Readify

Augusto Pinochet

My Tender Matador

Augusto Pinochet is presented as both the head of a repressive state and a man increasingly unable to separate political control from private fear. The novel places his recollections of the 1973 coup, his contempt for dissent, and his confidence in military protection beside the 1986 ambush that shatters that confidence. His private retreats and domestic life do not soften the regime’s violence; instead, they show how authoritarian power is maintained and imagined by a ruler who treats opposition as disorder and himself as the indispensable guardian of the nation.

Authority and the Private World

Pinochet regularly retreats to the Cajón del Maipo, where he reads about Roman strategies for suppressing rebellion and listens to the Radetzky March. His secluded version of the country excludes radio and television news, especially Radio Cooperativa, which he regards as a source of left-wing agitation. From that distance, demonstrations and opposition activity become evidence of disorder rather than political dissent. Yet the retreat is close to Santiago, and his motorcade repeatedly carries him between this private landscape and the city his government controls.

The contrast between his self-image and the world around him is especially clear in his assumptions about public loyalty. During one return journey he takes the Achupallas grade despite security concerns, dismissing the possibility that guerrillas could threaten him. He trusts the security services to keep the country under control, even as the road itself becomes a point of vulnerability. His confidence is not simply personal bravado: it rests on the armed apparatus of the regime and on the belief that no serious challenge can emerge beyond his knowledge.

At home, the same certainty takes the form of an insistence on regulating other people. When he notices a young couple in the countryside and decides that both are gay, he reacts with hostility and plans to alert the local mayor. Later, at the Cajón retreat, he sees a cadet talking with a bodyguard and orders the cadet expelled from the army. The secretary identifies the young man as Colonel Abarzúa’s nephew, but Pinochet treats the connection as irrelevant and demands a pretext for his removal. The episode shows prejudice operating as command: his private suspicion becomes an institutional punishment, backed by the authority of the military hierarchy.

Coup, Memory, and Political Self-Justification

Pinochet’s account of his own political history is shaped by a conviction that force has restored national order. As his motorcade passes through the canyon, he recalls the September 1973 attack on La Moneda, which he directed from a command room in the hills above Santiago. He remembers the moment as a test of resolve and imagines that his opponents expected him to hesitate. In his retrospective version, the coup becomes a decisive act against a country supposedly descending into disorder, rather than an assault that inaugurated military rule.

That self-justifying story is reinforced by his disdain for political and cultural opponents. He dismisses the Manuel Rodríguez Patriotic Front as students who imitate guerrillas, and derides protest songs, poetry, and left-wing writers as signs of weakness. His contempt for Pablo Neruda is tied to a fantasy of military discipline: he says the poet should have been drafted to learn how to be a real man. Such judgments reveal how he narrows political legitimacy to obedience and martial masculinity, casting cultural dissent as a threat to the nation he claims to have saved.

The novel also punctures the grandeur of this self-image through intimate memories and imagined scenes. In a childhood recollection, the young Augusto is surrounded by collections of toy soldiers, tanks, and military figures. He regards his classmates as enemies and dislikes the birthday party his mother arranges for him. The memory does not establish a simple cause for his later rule; rather, it places his attraction to military order within a personal history that the adult ruler’s public mythology cannot fully contain. Elsewhere, a dream of his own state funeral turns the spectacle of power into isolation: he is the sole protagonist, moving through emptied streets and unable to escape the dead and destruction beneath him.

The 1986 Ambush and the Collapse of Certainty

On September 11, 1986, Pinochet delays his return to Santiago from the Cajón del Maipo, where unrest, student protests, bombs, and blackouts are already weighing on his thoughts. He considers imposing a curfew and using the army against anyone who challenges the government, but continues to believe that the opposition will not confront his forces directly. Even a security warning about the route back to Santiago fails to persuade him to abandon the Achupallas grade.

The convoy is ambushed on the road. A vehicle swerves to avoid a trailer blocking the way, and gunfire strikes the windshields as the cars brake and scatter. A rocket attack hits the lead car, and the bodyguards fail to respond in an organized way. Pinochet’s chauffeur reverses the Mercedes-Benz through the damaged vehicles, turns around, and drives out of the attack. The escape saves Pinochet, but the scene reverses the assumptions on which he has relied: his protected convoy is vulnerable, his guards are caught off balance, and the route he insisted on taking becomes the site of a direct attack.

Afterward, Pinochet is shown as frightened and shaken rather than commanding. His wife, Lucy, says that she had warned him and recounts advice from Gonzalo, whose tarot reading had cautioned her against travel. Her complaints about the cost and ineffectiveness of the security apparatus deepen the contrast between the regime’s display of protection and its failure in the ambush. The authorities arrive at the Cajón property, where Pinochet has been bathed and is drinking tea with a tranquilizer prescribed by his doctors. His survival does not restore the composure that the public image of the presidency demands.

Image, Fear, and the Regime’s Aftermath

Lucy turns the damaged Mercedes-Benz into a religious sign, telling journalists that the bullet marks form an image of the Virgin and that the vehicle should be displayed publicly. Pinochet hears the press conference from his bedroom, still frightened by the attack. Her explanation converts a security failure into a story of divine protection, while his private response reveals how little that public narrative can do to quiet his fear. He later thinks that he will heed Lucy’s warnings and considers giving Gonzalo an advisory role, a change prompted by the very vulnerability he had previously dismissed.

The attack also unfolds against a wider landscape of repression. In Santiago, the authorities impose a military lockdown, search vehicles and homes, and detain people amid raids across poorer neighborhoods. Radio Cooperativa broadcasts warnings to remain indoors and report anything suspicious. These consequences place Pinochet’s personal crisis within the reach of state power: while he survives the ambush, the response to it subjects the city’s residents to searches, intimidation, and military control. The novel thus refuses to treat the attack only as a reversal in the ruler’s fortunes; it links his fear to the coercive machinery deployed in the name of restoring order.

Pinochet’s characterization depends on the tension between command and exposure. He can order a cadet’s dismissal, dismiss warnings from his security services, and imagine the army as the unquestioned instrument of his will. Yet the convoy’s disarray, his dependence on the chauffeur’s escape, and his fear after the attack disclose the limits of that control. The novel’s portrayal does not reduce the dictatorship to the ruler’s psychology: his private prejudices and anxieties matter because they are joined to institutions capable of punishing individuals and mobilizing force across the country.

Related StoryFlow