The Commandments
Narcissus and GoldmundThe Commandments are the written moral rules Narcissus invokes while challenging Goldmund’s belief that sexual desire marks an absolute boundary between sin and goodness. Their place in the exchange is deliberately limited: they make goodness knowable, but they cannot encompass God or serve as a complete measure of spiritual nearness.
Definition and Role
Narcissus describes the Commandments as the place where people know what is good because their requirements are written down. Yet he immediately qualifies their authority as a measure of the divine: they represent only an infinitesimal part of God. A person may therefore keep them and still remain far from God. The distinction separates rule-observance from spiritual relationship rather than dismissing the rules themselves.
The Conversation with Goldmund
Goldmund explains that his conscience is burdened not by an ordinary act of disobedience but by his fear of yielding to a girl’s enticement. He imagines that even reaching out to touch her could make him unable to turn back, swallowing his beautiful dreams, virtue, and love of God. In response, Narcissus distinguishes love of God from love of good and argues that the two do not always coincide; he wishes the distinction were simpler, but refuses to reduce it to compliance with written precepts.
When Goldmund protests that Narcissus does not understand, Narcissus identifies the structure of his fear: Goldmund treats woman and sex as the essence of the world and of sin. He also believes he could confess other sins and become whole again, while this particular transgression would destroy him. The Commandments thus enter a more intimate conflict than a debate about rules: Goldmund’s fear has made sexual desire appear uniquely irreversible, while Narcissus’s account opens a gap between a prohibited act, the written standard of goodness, and the larger question of nearness to God.
