Readify

Philip abandoned his clerical aspirations and sought to leave school to go to Germany

Of Human Bondage

Philip Carey’s decision to abandon the ministry and seek permission to leave school for Germany is an early assertion of independence: he rejects the vocation his family and teachers expected, then resists being turned back by their emotional and institutional authority. The episode does not end with immediate departure. Instead, Mr. Perkins persuades him to remain for another term, making the compromise a test of whether Philip can hold to his decision while accepting a delay.

Background and Waning Commitment

At King's School, Philip’s future had long been understood in religious and educational terms: he was expected to continue to Oxford and become ordained. The expectation belonged to a wider pattern of religious observance. At the vicarage, Sunday included church services and shopping conducted with close regard for parish allegiance; at school, Philip had joined the Bible League, paid half a crown, and undertaken a year of nightly scripture reading. These practices establish how thoroughly his early life had been organized around the Church of England, even before he began to question whether that inheritance was truly his.

His religious education, however, was not the same as a settled personal vocation. In the final school years, Philip’s attention drifted from work, and Mr. Perkins warned that he would not win the scholarship required for Oxford unless he began studying seriously. The headmaster also said that he had meant to make Philip a monitor but would postpone the appointment. Philip was irritated by the criticism, yet the warning brought the deeper question into the open: not only whether he could progress along the expected path, but whether he wanted it at all.

Refusing the Expected Future

When Mr. Perkins asked about Oxford and reminded Philip that he had once intended to be ordained, Philip replied that he had changed his mind. Asked why, he could not explain. A week later, Mr. Perkins returned to the subject in private, setting aside Philip’s poor work and doubtful scholarship prospects to concentrate on the change in his plans. The headmaster was sincerely distressed and tried skillfully to revive Philip’s religious eagerness, believing that Philip was surrendering his chance of happiness for an uncertain alternative.

Philip was deeply affected by the attention and emotion Mr. Perkins brought to the conversation. He felt gratitude and guilt, and was flattered that the headmaster had taken such personal trouble over him. Yet beneath those responses, he remained fixed on his refusal. Mr. Perkins eventually told him that he must decide for himself and pray for guidance. Philip left the headmaster’s house in light rain, walked alone beneath the archway and around the precincts, and reconsidered the appeal away from the force of the older man’s personality. He was relieved that he had not yielded.

That solitude also sharpened Philip’s dissatisfaction with the religious life he was being asked to resume. He recalled the long cathedral services, the difficulty of sitting still, and the Sunday services at Blackstable. He resented what he saw as a gap between his uncle’s clerical pronouncements and his conduct as a man. His rejection of ordination thus arose alongside a rejection of religious observance as an imposed routine, rather than from a newly articulated alternative creed.

Family Authority and the Request to Leave

Philip then brought the question of departure to his aunt and uncle. He asked whether there was any point in staying at Tercanbury and proposed going to Germany for a while. At tea, he made his changed intention explicit: he had given up the idea of ordination long ago. His aunt’s tears made the cost of his decision personal. Seeing her distress, Philip recognized her vulnerability in a way he had not before, and later embraced and comforted her.

The emotional scene did not settle the practical question. Philip’s uncle had planned for him to remain at King's School until he was eighteen and then go to Oxford. He initially refused an immediate departure: notice had not been given, and the current term’s fee would have to be paid regardless. After a long and often bitter conversation, Philip asked that notice be given for him to leave at Christmas. His uncle agreed to write to Mr. Perkins, but family concern and Philip’s own susceptibility to emotion briefly unsettled his resolve. After comforting his aunt, Philip had to hurry back to school for call-over; on the train he reproached himself for having let the vicar’s authority and his aunt’s tears distract him from his purpose. A further letter from his uncle nevertheless asked Mr. Perkins to speak with Philip and consider allowing him to leave at Christmas if he still wished it.

A Delayed Departure, Not a Reversal

Mr. Perkins responded by acknowledging a limit of the school system: it was designed for the average, with little time to accommodate individual differences. He did not simply approve an immediate departure. The term was nearly over, he argued, and another term would not harm Philip; Germany would be more pleasant in spring than in midwinter. If Philip still wanted to leave at the end of the next term, Perkins would make no objection.

Philip accepted the arrangement gratefully. The additional months no longer made the school feel like a prison because he could see them as a finite interval before freedom. He even found himself looking more kindly on his fellow pupils, including Rose, whose place as a monitor had mattered to Philip when he imagined himself remaining. The shift is not a return to the school’s ambitions for him: the prospect of departure changes how he experiences the same surroundings, while the decision to leave remains in place. The episode ends with permission deferred until the end of the term, and with Philip’s immediate objective—freedom from the prescribed school-and-ministry path—secured in principle.

Significance in Philip’s Development

The conflict is shaped by competing kinds of authority. Mr. Perkins has institutional standing and a genuine personal investment in Philip’s future; Philip’s uncle controls the school arrangement and its financial timing; his aunt’s grief makes departure an intimate family wound. Philip is not untouched by any of them. He is moved, feels guilty, and briefly fears that he has weakened. His independence appears not as effortless defiance but as the capacity to return to a choice after other people’s emotions have pressed upon it.

The episode also links the rejection of ordination to a more general search for self-direction. Philip cannot yet give a clear reason for his altered intention, and his proposal to go to Germany is framed as a possibility rather than a fully explained plan. What becomes definite is what he no longer wants: the established sequence of school, Oxford, and clerical life. His eventual loss of religious belief in Germany belongs to a later stage; here, the decisive development is that he has already begun to separate his own future from the religious expectations that formed it.