James Mortimer
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-TimeJames Mortimer is a doctor from Devon who brings Sherlock Holmes a family legend and a present danger in The Hound of the Baskervilles, the book Christopher calls his favorite. Mortimer’s account sets the detective story in motion: concerned that Sir Charles Baskerville may have been frightened to death by the legendary hound, he fears for Sir Henry Baskerville, the dead man’s son and heir. In Christopher’s retelling, Mortimer’s medical authority and anxious interpretation connect an unexplained death to the investigation that eventually exposes a human killer and an engineered appearance of the supernatural.
Identity and Introduction
Mortimer enters the story as a doctor from the moors in Devon and a friend of Sir Charles Baskerville. He visits Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson after Sir Charles’s death, bringing both personal concern and information about the Baskerville family’s past. His role is that of a witness and instigator: he does not solve the mystery, but the questions he raises give Holmes and Watson reason to investigate.
The visit carries two kinds of evidence. Mortimer reports the recent death of Sir Charles, which has been attributed to a heart attack, and produces an ancient scroll describing a supposed curse on the Baskervilles. His account makes the family legend relevant to the present by placing the death beside a story of a monstrous hound and a fatal encounter on the moor.
The Legend and the Danger to Sir Henry
The scroll traces the curse to Sir Hugo Baskerville, an ancestor described as violent and irreligious. In its tale, a young woman flees from him across the moor; when the pursuers catch up, they find her dead and see a huge hound attacking Sir Hugo. One of Sir Hugo’s companions dies of fear that night, while the others are left profoundly affected. As Christopher recounts it, this inherited tale offers a supernatural explanation for the danger surrounding the Baskervilles, though it is a story within the detective story rather than proof of a supernatural cause.
Mortimer thinks the Hound of the Baskervilles may have frightened Sir Charles to death. He is also worried that Sir Henry will be in danger when he goes to Baskerville Hall in Devon. The concern is consequential even though the suspected cause is mistaken: Mortimer’s warning helps prompt Holmes to act before the heir is exposed to the threat.
Role in the Investigation
In response to Mortimer’s concern, Holmes sends Dr. Watson to Devon with Sir Henry and Mortimer. Watson attempts to determine who might have killed Sir Charles, while Holmes says he will remain in London and secretly conducts his own investigation in Devon. Mortimer therefore accompanies the journey that makes the danger at the Hall an active inquiry, although Christopher’s summary does not assign him the detective work that uncovers the solution.
The eventual explanation overturns the supernatural suspicion Mortimer has raised. Holmes discovers that Stapleton, a poor neighbor and distant Baskerville relation, arranged the death in the hope of inheriting the Hall. Stapleton used a large dog brought from London and covered with phosphorus; the dog’s glowing appearance frightened Sir Charles. Mortimer’s interpretation is thus understandable within the evidence available to him but incomplete: the apparent curse masks a calculated human scheme.
Narrative Significance
Mortimer is the hinge between an old family legend and a modern investigation. His scroll supplies the story’s ominous pattern, while his worry about Sir Henry translates that pattern into immediate stakes. The later explanation preserves the force of the mystery while replacing the hound’s supernatural power with deception, motive, and a real animal used as an instrument.
Christopher’s inclusion of Mortimer’s visit in a book he loves also reveals his interest in how an investigator moves from a striking account to a testable explanation. The story first presents Sir Charles’s death through Mortimer’s fear and the curse’s inherited narrative; Holmes’s investigation then distinguishes the legend from the means and motive behind the death. Mortimer’s importance lies less in being right about the hound than in asking the question that sets that distinction in motion.