Readify

Sicilian Revolution and Constitutional Period (1820–1821)

The Florios of Sicily

The Sicilian Revolution and Constitutional Period (1820–1821) is the short-lived attempt to restore Sicily’s political autonomy after Bourbon rule abolished the Kingdom of Sicily and revoked its 1812 constitution. The revolt briefly brought back the constitution and a Sicilian parliament, but divisions among Sicilian cities and intervention by the Bourbon monarchy and its allies ended the constitutional experiment. The novel sets this upheaval against the everyday machinery of commerce: customs rules, blocked ships, and administrative control show how sovereignty is exercised through the circulation of goods and money.

Causes and political background

The revolt arose from accumulated resentment toward the Bourbons, whose return to power had made Sicily subordinate to a government centered in Naples. Since December 1816, Neapolitans had administered state offices and customs and held military commands. Heavier taxes, restrictions, and new constraints on trade weakened an already struggling economy. For the Florios, this was not merely a constitutional dispute: the new arrangements helped bring commerce to a halt and put their accounts under pressure.

Sicilian resistance, however, did not speak with one voice. The island’s cities were divided: Palermo resented Messina, Trapani was allied with Messina against Palermo, and Catania pursued its own interests. Their shared hostility toward authority beyond the Strait of Messina did not resolve these rivalries. The narrative stresses the contradiction between Sicily’s claim to a historic parliament and its inability to agree on how to use that institution. This division later gives the Bourbons an advantage in suppressing the revolt.

The political crisis on the mainland helped create an opening. Army units in Naples rebelled, and the discovery that many officers belonged to the Carbonari was followed by soldiers joining the insurgents. Under pressure, Ferdinand I granted a constitutional charter recognizing rights and establishing a parliament. Sicilian political actors seized on that instability, but their aims went further: they sought to restore the separate Kingdom of Sicily, not simply to follow the mainland’s constitutional settlement.

Revolt and constitutional restoration

On June 15, 1820, revolt broke out in Sicily. Prince Francesco took refuge in Naples, and a Sicilian parliament was created and restored the constitution. A parallel insurrection on the mainland, led by General Guglielmo Pepe on July 7, forced Ferdinand I to accept a constitution modeled on the charter Ferdinand VII of Spain had promulgated in March. For a brief period, constitutional claims in Sicily and Naples advanced together, though they rested on different political projects.

The novel also locates the Sicilian rising in the charged public life of Palermo. During the Feast of Saint Rosalia, the city’s streets and squares filled with people, wagons, horses, and competing cries. In a crowd at Piano San Giacomo, Ignazio heard calls demanding that Ferdinand return the constitution taken away in 1816 and proclaiming the Kingdom of Sicily. The public scene makes the constitutional issue tangible: it is voiced in the streets, amid the movement and danger of a city in revolt, rather than confined to parliamentary procedure.

Behind the demands for independence lay a struggle over who would govern Sicily and whose authority counted as legitimate. The aristocracy had once welcomed and protected the Bourbons when they fled to Sicily, but the monarchy later stripped nobles of power, privilege, and offices. Sicilian aristocrats regarded the king as a foreign ruler imposed on their home and competed with the Crown for control. Their opposition was not simply an appeal for popular liberty: the narrative shows nobles seeking to recover their own standing and influence, while mobilizing other groups to bear the risks of revolt.

Suppression and the end of the experiment

The independence-seeking government’s ambition to restore the Kingdom of Sicily collided with Bourbon interests. The monarchy exploited discord among Palermo, Messina, and Catania, and the revolt was suppressed through bloodshed. In November 1820, the monarchy was restored and Sicily returned to the control of the Neapolitan government. The reinstatement of constitutional forms had therefore proved temporary: the island’s political autonomy was not secured by the revolt.

The defeat extended beyond the island. Ferdinand I had asked the Holy Alliance for help, and Prussia, Russia, and Austria acted against the insurgents. On March 24, 1821, Austrian troops entered Naples and restored the king to the throne. They remained until 1827, when Francesco I, who had succeeded his father Ferdinand in 1825, eventually drove them out. The episode closes not with a settled Sicilian constitutional order but with foreign military intervention reinforcing Bourbon authority on the mainland and Neapolitan control over Sicily.

Commerce, administration, and the Florios

The story gives political change a commercial texture. The Florios’ operations already depended on the rules governing where goods could be stored and when import duties were paid. They rented guarded warehouse rooms within the Palazzo Steri property, behind the customs offices, for spices moving to other ports or awaiting sale. The tariff was paid only when goods entered Palermo, allowing wholesalers to avoid taxes while merchandise remained in transit. This arrangement makes customs more than a setting: control over the institution directly shapes the cost and movement of trade.

During the revolt, that system became unstable. Customs faced confusion as a provisional government was being formed, and officials sought to requisition goods. The Florios learned that outgoing ships had been blocked; Ignazio, informed by Ben Ingham, hurried toward the crowded Customs House. A political transition that promised Sicilian independence thus immediately threatened the merchants’ ability to move stock and fulfill commercial obligations. The disruption echoes the earlier post-1816 restrictions: successive authorities could alter the Florios’ prospects by controlling taxation, customs, and shipping.

The constitutional period also illuminates the limits of merchant influence. In a later revolutionary crisis, Vincenzo bought a large consignment of rifles in England on behalf of a revolutionary committee, while ships were requisitioned and trade fell by half. The Sicilian Steamship Company’s vessel Palermo, previously operating at full capacity, was taken by Ruggero Settimo’s government to transport troops. These later pressures do not belong to the 1820–1821 revolt itself, but they extend the novel’s account of a recurring problem: political projects depend on commercial resources, while merchants whose assets make those projects possible remain exposed to their demands.

Historical pattern and significance

The period establishes a recurring pattern in the novel: political promises of autonomy confront the practical instruments of state power. Constitutions and parliaments matter, but so do control of customs offices, taxes, ports, ships, and money. The early post-1816 restrictions crippled trade; the revolt then blocked outgoing ships and unsettled customs; later revolutionary authorities would again requisition Florio assets. These changes reveal that political authority is experienced not only as a claim to rule but as the power to interrupt or redirect commerce.

The eventual restoration of Bourbon control also frames later arguments about Italian unification. Vincenzo would later object that the Piedmontese were turning Sicily into a colony and accuse the new authorities of taking the Bourbon treasury to pay for annexation. That later conflict does not erase the distinct constitutional episode of 1820–1821, but it shows how the island’s repeated subordination remains a live political memory. The failed revolt therefore functions both as a historical defeat and as an early instance of the novel’s central tension between Sicilian self-government and rule imposed from outside.