Mexico
The Second SexMexico appears in the account of Simone de Beauvoir’s travels with Nelson Algren in 1947 and the following year. It belongs to the geographical background of an encounter that helped her develop the essay on women into The Second Sex, though the evidence does not describe particular events or locations within Mexico.
Travels with Nelson Algren
During a trip to the United States in 1947, Beauvoir met Algren, whom the account calls the most significant of her male others. He encouraged her to expand her essay on women into a book. In that year and the next, the two explored the United States and Mexico together. Mexico is thus identified as part of their shared travels, not as the setting for a separately recounted episode.
Context for The Second Sex
The travels formed part of the period in which Beauvoir researched and composed The Second Sex, an eight-hundred-page work produced in about fourteen months between 1946 and 1949 while she also pursued other literary and editorial commitments. The account specifically connects Beauvoir’s understanding of racism to experiences on the American journey and to her friendship with Richard Wright; it does not attribute a particular intellectual discovery to her time in Mexico. The distinction matters: Mexico is securely part of the itinerary, but the evidence does not specify what she saw or learned there.
Comparative frame
The book’s argument examines how groups are made into subordinated others and compares women’s position with those of Black people, Jews, and the proletariat, while also marking the limits of such comparisons. It observes that women, unlike groups divided from one another by some historical event or conquest, have long lived dispersed among men and tied to fathers, husbands, homes, work, and economic interests. Class and race further divide women: bourgeois women may share interests with bourgeois men, and white women with white men, rather than with poorer or Black women.
This analysis provides a relevant intellectual frame for Beauvoir’s travels, but the evidence does not say that Mexico itself occasioned a specific comparison or conclusion. Its significance in this account remains geographical and contextual: it was one destination in a period of travel and intellectual work during which Beauvoir was developing a major study of women’s subordination.
