Readify

Mlle Aïssé

The Second Sex

Mlle Aïssé is a historical example in Simone de Beauvoir’s discussion of women who turn to love as a way out when other meaningful projects seem unavailable. Nearly thirty when her love life began, she illustrates how a woman’s apparent choice of devotion may be shaped by a social order that has made independent paths difficult to pursue. Beauvoir also suggests that Mlle Aïssé may have experienced happiness beside Knight d’Aydie, but places that happiness within the unequal structure of the woman-in-love’s dependence on a man who cannot truly be the god she needs him to be.

Love as a Way Out

Beauvoir names Mlle Aïssé alongside Juliette Drouet and Madame d’Agoult as a woman who began her love life close to thirty, in contrast to Julie de Lespinasse, who was nearly forty. The timing matters to Beauvoir’s argument: these women had not spent their youth surrendering their emotions to juvenile infatuations, yet when the possibility of dedicating themselves to an exceptional man arose, love became a desperate hope. Mlle Aïssé’s example belongs to a wider account of women who, unable to see a worthwhile independent venture before them, find in love what appears to be their only exit.

That exit is not presented as a simple personal failing. Beauvoir argues that women may be permitted independence and still find love the most attractive route, because they are surrounded by temptations to take what seems the easier path rather than bear responsibility for their own life’s project. In this framework, Mlle Aïssé’s late beginning in love marks not merely a biographical detail but the narrowed horizon against which devotion could appear to offer rescue.

Happiness Beside Knight d’Aydie

Later, Beauvoir returns to Mlle Aïssé as a possible instance of the happiness that love can bring. She suggests that Mlle Aïssé may have known a period of glorious felicity at Knight d’Aydie’s side, before religious scruples troubled her soul. The qualification is significant: this is offered as a possibility, and the happiness is neither described as an unbroken life story nor separated from the spiritual difficulty that eventually disturbed it.

Beauvoir places this possible happiness within a pattern of identification with the beloved. The woman in love may feel recognized as part of a man’s world, sharing his prestige and finding peace in a place that remains secondary but seems secure. Mlle Aïssé’s relationship therefore serves as an example of the attraction of that arrangement, not as proof that dependence guarantees lasting fulfillment.

The Limits of Devotion

The analysis turns on the instability of making a man into an absolute source of meaning. A human beloved is present, unlike the divine absence that depends on the mystic’s own fervor; he is not God. The woman who accepts herself as inessential and wholly dependent risks turning love into torment, because the beloved cannot provide the unconditional necessity or justification she has invested in him. Beauvoir’s account of Mlle Aïssé stops short of specifying the later course of her relationship with Knight d’Aydie; it identifies religious scruples as a disturbance and uses her possible earlier happiness to illuminate the precarious bargain of devotion.

Role in Beauvoir’s Argument

Mlle Aïssé is not developed as a sustained narrative character here. Her brief appearance connects two strands of Beauvoir’s argument: women may come to love late when other avenues for self-realization have failed, and a woman may nonetheless experience real happiness in the subordinate world that love seems to confer. The tension between those claims is central. What feels like a refuge can also make a woman’s justification depend on a man who remains a separate, imperfect person.

Her example thus sharpens Beauvoir’s broader account of women as autonomous freedoms placed in a world that forces them to assume the position of the Other. The social conditions shaping a woman’s possible choices help explain why love can appear as the only way out; the dependence built into that choice explains why its promised security cannot be final.