Orestes
The Second SexOrestes appears not as the center of a dramatic character portrait but as a figure in a myth used to explain how patriarchal authority legitimates itself. His killing of Clytemnestra and subsequent acquittal make a shift in family power appear as a decisive victory: the divine tribunal recognizes him as Agamemnon’s son before Clytemnestra’s son, placing paternal descent above maternal connection.
Mythic Identity and Function
The book refers to the drama of the Eumenides as an illustration of patriarchy’s triumph over maternal right. Orestes’s role is defined by two linked actions: he kills his mother, and the gods’ tribunal absolves him. That verdict does more than settle his fate. It declares which parent counts as the authoritative source of kinship, aligning Orestes with his father and subordinating the mother’s claim.
The Acquittal and Its Meaning
The acquittal turns a family conflict into a public judgment. By affirming Agamemnon’s paternity as primary, the tribunal represents paternal authority as the basis of legitimate descent. The book places this myth alongside the story of Bel-Marduk’s victory over Tiamat: both give cosmic or divine form to a supposed victory over maternal power. In the Eumenides, Orestes’s survival under the tribunal’s judgment supplies the human and legal counterpart to that larger symbolic pattern.
Historical and Thematic Significance
The legend presents the change in rights as a bloody conquest, but the book distinguishes that representation from historical process. The passage from maternal to paternal rights, it argues, occurred through gradual transitions rather than a single struggle in which men defeated women. The violence of Orestes’s story therefore reveals less about the literal course of history than about the meaning later attached to it: patriarchy imagines its authority as a victory that had to be won.
That imagined victory also recasts the relation between the sexes as a drama between subject and other. The book reads Orestes’s acquittal as part of a wider symbolic ordering in which male authority is associated with order and the maternal with what that order excludes. Orestes thus serves as a vehicle for showing how myth can make the subordination of women appear not merely customary, but sanctioned by divine judgment.