Readify

Roman Catholic Church

The Second Sex

The Roman Catholic Church is presented as a powerful institution in the history of women’s subordination, joining theological claims to marriage law, sexual morality, and public authority. Its influence is not described as simple or uniform: Christian ideals could recognize women as souls equal before God, and Catholic supporters sometimes advocated women’s political rights, even as ecclesiastical teaching and practice repeatedly confined women to subordinate roles. The book’s central emphasis is on this tension between spiritual elevation and social dependence.

Christian Teaching and Women’s Subordination

The book places the Church’s historical influence amid the social and political upheavals that followed the great invasions, when Christian ideology interacted with Roman law and barbarian custom. In its account, early Christian charity extended to women as well as to the poor and enslaved, and women joined men as martyrs. Yet women could worship only in secondary roles: deaconesses were authorized for practical service, such as caring for the sick and assisting the poor. Respect within the religious community did not amount to equality in its offices or authority.

Marriage, though treated as requiring mutual fidelity, was framed through a hierarchy that placed the wife beneath her husband. The book traces this position to scriptural interpretations that described woman as made from and for man and established the husband as head of the wife. The religious denigration of the flesh intensified the association of woman with temptation. Inherited antifeminist claims thus became more than personal prejudice: they were given sacred authority and presented as a divinely grounded order.

The book identifies a further institutional consequence in canon law. Marriage was treated as a concession incompatible with Christian perfection, while the recognized dowry regime left women without effective power. Women were excluded from male functions, barred from giving court depositions, and denied the weight of testimony. The discussion distinguishes this legal and familial helplessness from an inherent incapacity: the restrictions arose from women’s position within the family and the rules imposed upon them.

Marriage Law and Institutional Power

The contrast between ecclesiastical doctrine and civil legislation reveals how women’s status could be constrained in one respect and acknowledged in another. Justinian’s legislation, as described in the book, honored women as wives and mothers while channeling their recognized standing through those roles. Divorce was prohibited, and marriage had to be public. A mother had the same authority over her children as their father, enjoyed equal inheritance rights in relation to them, and could become their legal tutor if her husband died. At the same time, her dowry remained inalienable as her children’s patrimony, and she could not dispose of it; she also could not contract on her husband’s behalf.

The book’s account therefore does not reduce women’s legal history to a single, uninterrupted decline. Civil protections and Christian subordination coexisted, and legal capacity depended on a woman’s family position and the particular matter at issue. The Church’s influence lay not only in explicit doctrine but also in the standards by which marriage, authority, and women’s proper social place were understood.

Sexual Morality and Abortion

The Church’s position on abortion is presented as substantially more severe than the shifting treatment found in civil law. The book recounts how French laws and penalties changed over time, while ecclesiastical condemnation remained uncompromising. A canon-law provision dated March 27, 1917, imposed automatic excommunication on those who procured an abortion, including the mother, once the procedure had succeeded. The rule allowed no exception even when the mother’s life was in danger.

This severity stood against the practical reality of widespread abortion. The book describes abortion as practiced extensively despite law and religion, and notes that many women faced the dangers of unregulated procedures. Its account connects the issue to women’s restricted reproductive autonomy: the consequences of pregnancy fell on women, while religious and legal authorities claimed power to regulate their choices. The Church’s position thus formed part of a broader conflict between moral doctrine, state policy, and women’s lived circumstances.

The text also notes a gap between formal Catholic prohibitions and advice in practice. Although positive methods of birth control, including withdrawal, were forbidden, some spiritual advisers recommended using a calendar of infertile days. The example complicates any picture of doctrine as perfectly and uniformly applied: believers and advisers could accommodate conduct that official rules rejected, even while presenting it as consistent with religious guidance.

Political Influence and Women’s Rights

In the French suffrage debate, Catholic advocacy could support women’s political rights while remaining entangled with partisan calculation. After the Chamber approved a women’s voting and eligibility amendment in 1932 by 319 votes to one, the Senate rejected it. The book notes that Pope Benedict XV had declared himself in favor of women’s suffrage in 1919, followed by prominent Catholic churchmen who campaigned for it. Catholics could regard French women as a conservative and religious voting constituency, while opponents feared the electoral consequences of women’s votes. The Church’s support therefore entered a political contest in which the same proposal drew allies for different reasons.

This episode sits within the book’s wider conclusion that women’s history was written and governed largely by men. It argues that feminist campaigns were not wholly autonomous movements: their opportunities often depended on male political choices and on conflicts among existing institutions and parties. Catholic support for suffrage could help challenge women’s exclusion, but it did not by itself undo the structures that defined women’s status through marriage, family, and religious morality.

Devotion, Mary, and Women’s Religious Experience

Christianity’s representation of women is also marked by an apparent reversal. The woman associated with sexual temptation could, through renunciation of the flesh, be elevated as a redeemed soul. The book describes this spiritual equality as conditional: women could stand beside men among those promised salvation insofar as they rejected their supposed animality and submitted to the religious order. The feminine ideal was therefore not an autonomous authority but a sanctified form of obedience.

The Virgin Mary embodies this contradiction. She is exalted as the mother who mediates salvation and stands against the figure of Eve, yet her glorification occurs through a role defined by submission. The book presents the Marian ideal as a rehabilitation that confirms defeat: woman is honored as mother and servant, while the power once attributed to maternal nature is transferred to God. Motherhood gains reverence, but not independent authority. Christian imagery can thus raise the mother to extraordinary symbolic heights while leaving women annexed to men in social life.

Women’s devotion, in the book’s account, often takes a bodily and affective form. It discusses the greater number of women among Church-recognized stigmatics: of 321 recognized people with stigmata, only 47 were men, and most of the rest were women, on average past menopause. Catherine Emmerich was identified as a notable exception to that age pattern: the account places her first reported crown-of-thorns vision at twenty-four, followed years later by visions associated with Christ’s wounds. These examples are used to describe a religious imagination in which suffering and the transformation of bodily pain into spiritual meaning hold particular force for women.

The Church consequently occupies two related positions in the book’s argument. It helps authorize women’s social subordination through doctrine and law, yet it also supplies religious roles, images, and forms of devotion through which women may be revered or seek meaning. That reverence does not erase the hierarchy: the saint and the Virgin can be exalted precisely within a system that assigns women a subordinate place.