Myron Scholes
The Wisdom of CrowdsMyron Scholes, a founding figure of modern finance, joined the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) as part of a celebrated team of investors and financial experts. The book presents the fund’s 1998 collapse as a warning that individual expertise and powerful models do not necessarily yield sound collective judgment, especially when a group’s confidence is tested by a sudden change in market conditions.
Place in the Fund
LTCM was founded in 1994 by John Meriwether, a former bond trader whose reputation on Wall Street helped attract investors. The fund combined computer-modeling specialists with prominent figures in modern finance. Scholes and Robert Merton, who had devised a model widely used to value options, were among its high-profile members. Their presence made LTCM appear less like an ordinary hedge fund than an investment version of the Manhattan Project: a team assembled around unusually deep expertise and technical power.
Confidence and Success
The promise of that team helped draw investors despite demanding terms: a minimum investment of $10 million, with a quarter of each year’s profits going to the fund’s managers. Investors were especially eager to join after LTCM produced impressive returns for four consecutive years. The book sets that success against the fund’s vulnerability: a strong record and a roster of eminent experts could encourage confidence, but neither could guarantee that the models and strategies would withstand a transformed market.
The 1998 Crisis
In August 1998, Russia defaulted on its debt against a backdrop of investor unease following the earlier collapse of Asian economies. The default prompted a flight to quality: investors sought assets perceived as reliable and rushed to sell those viewed as risky. LTCM was left holding billions of dollars in assets that buyers no longer wanted, while their prices fell sharply. Over a few months, the fund lost $4.5 billion. Its efforts to sell assets to stay afloat pushed prices down further and inflicted hundreds of millions of dollars in losses on Wall Street banks. In September, a consortium of thirteen banks bailed out the fund.
Significance
Scholes’s role in LTCM gives the episode its pointed contrast: expertise in financial modeling, even when joined to a strong record and enormous investor confidence, did not insulate the fund from a shock that changed what the market was willing to buy. The book uses the crisis to distinguish the work of estimating value from the problem of living with markets that can move against a position for long enough to overwhelm its holders. Scholes is not presented as acting alone; his significance here lies in his membership in the high-profile expert group whose collective authority failed to prevent a near-catastrophic financial crisis.