National Reform Union
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and PovertyThe National Reform Union was founded in 1864 in the wake of the Chartist movement’s decline, carrying forward pressure for electoral reform. It belonged to a longer sequence of organized campaigns that helped make political participation broader and more difficult for established elites to restrict.
Formation and Reform Campaigns
The Chartist movement had organized mass demonstrations and advanced demands for changes including the secret ballot and more frequent parliamentary elections. Although Chartism disintegrated after 1848, the reform campaign did not end with it: the National Reform Union was founded in 1864, followed by the Reform League in 1865. These organizations renewed political pressure through new collective structures.
In July 1866, major pro-reform riots in Hyde Park brought reform back to the top of the political agenda. The resulting Second Reform Act of 1867 doubled the electorate and made working-class voters the majority in every urban constituency. The secret ballot followed shortly afterward, alongside measures against corrupt practices such as treating, in which voters were offered money, food, or alcohol in exchange for their votes.
From Electoral Pressure to Wider Participation
Further reform continued to expand the electorate. The Third Reform Act of 1884 doubled it again, enfranchising 60 percent of adult men. After the First World War, the 1918 Representation of the People Act extended the vote to all men over twenty-one and to women over thirty who were taxpayers or married to taxpayers; in 1928 women gained the vote on the same terms as men. These later changes arose from additional political pressures, including wartime bargaining between the government and working classes needed for military service and munitions production.
The National Reform Union therefore appears within a continuing chain of organization and reform, rather than as an isolated campaign. Mass mobilization and successor organizations kept questions of representation in public debate; successive reforms translated that pressure into a larger electorate and, eventually, broader political inclusion.