Matabeleland
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and PovertyMatabeleland, in what is now Zimbabwe, is presented as a region where successive contests over land and political authority left deep consequences. The British South Africa Company’s military expansion into the Ndebele kingdom based in Matabeleland helped establish colonial rule; after independence, the region’s association with opposition support made it the setting for a devastating campaign under Robert Mugabe.
Colonial Conquest and Settler Rule
In 1890, the British South Africa Company sent a military expedition into the Ndebele kingdom, based in Matabeleland, and neighboring Mashonaland. Its superior weaponry quickly suppressed African resistance. By 1901, Southern Rhodesia, named after company leader Cecil Rhodes, had been formed in the area that is now Zimbabwe. The company expected prospecting and mining for precious minerals to be profitable, but those ventures did not succeed. Instead, the region’s rich farmland attracted white settlers, who soon annexed much of the land.
By 1923, the settlers had freed themselves from the company’s rule and persuaded the British government to grant them self-government. Rhodesia then developed a white-only apartheid state, modeled on South Africa’s system of racial and economic division. Matabeleland’s colonial history thus began not only with the conquest of an African kingdom but with the transfer of land and political control into settler hands.
Independence and Political Opposition
In 1965, as European colonial empires were collapsing, Rhodesia’s white elite, led by Ian Smith and representing possibly 5 percent of the population, declared independence from Britain. Few governments recognized the declaration, and the United Nations imposed economic and political sanctions. Black citizens organized guerrilla resistance from neighboring Mozambique and Zambia. The rebellion of the two principal groups, Robert Mugabe’s ZANU and Joshua Nkomo’s ZAPU, together with international pressure, brought white rule to a negotiated end. Zimbabwe became independent in 1980.
After independence, Nkomo’s ZAPU retained its strongest support in Matabeleland. This regional political alignment became consequential as Mugabe established personal control, eliminating opponents through violence or co-opting them. The account identifies Matabeleland as the heartland of ZAPU support, linking the region’s political significance directly to the conflict between Mugabe’s government and its opposition.
Violence and the Consolidation of Rule
The most egregious violence of Mugabe’s early consolidation took place in Matabeleland in the early 1980s, where as many as twenty thousand people were killed. The account situates this violence within a broader process of political centralization: in 1987, ZAPU merged with ZANU to form ZANU-PF, and Nkomo was politically sidelined.
Mugabe also rewrote the constitution inherited from the independence negotiations. He became president after initially serving as prime minister, abolished white voter rolls that had been part of the independence agreement, and eventually eliminated the Senate in 1990 while creating legislative positions he could fill by nomination. These changes produced a de facto one-party state. Matabeleland’s place in the account is therefore both geographical and political: it was the opposition’s stronghold and the location of the gravest violence during the construction of Mugabe’s personal rule.