Readify

“It is with Love as with Cuckoldom”

The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman

“It is with Love as with Cuckoldom” is a comic comparison that makes love resemble cuckoldry in one decisive respect: the person most involved may be the last to understand what is happening. The narrator uses the expression to connect emotional self-ignorance with the instability of language, then turns that general observation toward Uncle Toby and the household’s knowledge of his feelings.

The Comparison and Its Meaning

The narrator first announces the comparison while discussing how to begin a book, then postpones its explanation to make room for a thought he says must be imparted at once. The contrast is characteristic of the passage: the comparison can be offered at any hour, whereas the narrator’s reflection on beginning a book cannot wait. He declares that his own method is the most religious because he writes the first sentence and trusts the second to Almighty God, placing the aphorism within a running meditation on beginnings and the act of narration.

When the comparison returns, it is explained as a pattern of delayed knowledge. In love, as in cuckoldry, the party who suffers is at least the third person in the house to know of the matter, and is generally the last. The formulation makes private feeling a kind of domestic secret whose circulation outruns the awareness of the person most affected.

Language and Uncertain Feeling

The narrator attributes this delay to the fact that people have several words for one thing. In the human frame, what counts as love in one place may be hatred in another; sentiment can become nonsense, and the passage’s gesture toward bodily location gives the distinction a deliberately comic, suggestive edge. Rather than treating love as a transparent inner state, the account shows how uncertain naming makes it difficult to know what a feeling is—or whether it has been rightly understood at all.

The line therefore does more than provide a witty parallel. Its verbal play makes the reader experience the instability it describes: “Love,” “Hatred,” “Sentiment,” and “Nonsense” are not secure labels that settle the matter, but competing names through which the matter becomes confused. The narrator’s aside to a lady and his pointed reference to the part indicated by his forefinger turn an abstract problem of language into teasing physical comedy, without resolving the ambiguity.

Uncle Toby and Household Knowledge

The comparison becomes a frame for Uncle Toby’s position. Among mortal and immortal men who have ever soliloquized on the mystic subject, the narrator says, Uncle Toby was especially ill-fitted to pursue such a contention of feelings. Left to himself, he would have let the feelings run on and waited to see what they became, rather than forcing them into an inquiry or conclusion.

That private delay is interrupted by information already moving through the household. Bridget has given Susannah advance notice of Uncle Toby’s feelings, and Susannah has repeatedly made them known to everyone. Their disclosures make it necessary for Uncle Toby to look into the affair. The contrast is the expression’s point in action: while the household has begun to know and discuss the matter, Uncle Toby himself is only being brought to examine it. The aphorism thus joins the novel’s comic interest in love to its larger attention to how words, reports, and indirect knowledge shape what people understand about themselves.

Related StoryFlow