Eveline Hutchins–Jerry Burnham relationship
1919Eveline Hutchins and Jerry Burnham form a close, emotionally frank connection in Paris, but it remains unreciprocated in the sense Jerry desires. He offers companionship, confidences, and an increasingly direct declaration of love; Eveline is fond of him and responds with warmth, yet does not choose him as a partner. Their relationship turns on that gap: Jerry wants intimacy to mean commitment, while Eveline can care for him and still turn elsewhere.
Parisian Companionship
Jerry, a red-faced correspondent working for the U.P., first helped Eveline during the difficult night of her arrival in Paris. Their later encounters grow out of his rounds covering Red Cross activities at her office. He appears every few days, and their working connection expands into a familiar routine: dinners at the Tour d’Argent, lunches at the Taverne Nicholas Flamel, and afternoon walks through the old streets of the Marais. They sometimes settle at a quiet café table because Jerry suspects the waiters of being spies. The outings give them time together beyond the office, though the companionship does not develop into a mutual romance.
Their conversations reveal the emotional difference beneath that easy familiarity. Over cognac and soda, Jerry pours out his disgust with newspaper work. Censorship restricts what correspondents can report, he says, and forces him to send prepared accounts he considers lies. He sees the job as an assault on a newspaperman’s self-respect, already compromised before the war and now made worse by wartime controls. Eveline tries to encourage him: after the war, she suggests, he could write a truthful book. Jerry doubts the war will end while it remains profitable, and speaks bitterly of money being made in America, Britain, and France. His confidences make her a trusted listener, but they also bind their private intimacy to a larger disillusionment with the work and institutions around them.
Affection Without Reciprocity
The relationship is tender in its everyday gestures, but Eveline’s tenderness does not amount to the commitment Jerry hopes for. When he takes her to lunch at the Medicis Grill after returning from Armenia, he protests that she is being taken in by J. Ward Moorehouse, whom he dismisses as a publicity agent and a persuasive façade. He admits that he does not expect her to fall in love with him. Eveline answers that she is fond of him and asks him not to make the conversation tiresome. The exchange makes the asymmetry plain: she acknowledges affection, while he names a desire she does not return.
Jerry’s criticism is not detached professional analysis. His objection to Moorehouse is bound up with his own attachment and fear that Eveline has chosen a powerful public figure over a more candid, less celebrated man. He recalls that he had thought her different from other upper-class women because she earned her own living. Eveline does not accept the argument as a reason to change her feelings. Instead, she tries to set aside their quarrel and enjoy Paris in winter. Their intimacy lets Jerry challenge her choices openly, but it does not give him authority over them.
Moorehouse and the Strain Between Them
Eveline’s attraction to Moorehouse becomes a concrete source of friction. One evening, she breaks a prior dinner date with Jerry to dine with Moorehouse at the Café de la Paix. Moorehouse describes America’s postwar expansion and its imagined role in healing Europe; his account sounds rehearsed, but his self-deprecating admission that the vision is true makes Eveline laugh, and she finds that she likes him. The evening shifts her attention toward Moorehouse even as it confirms that Jerry remains part of her social and emotional life: she has to cancel their engagement to accept the other invitation.
The contrast sharpens when Eveline and Moorehouse later return to her rooms and encounter Don Stevens with Paul Johnson. The group sits awkwardly, unable to talk about anything but Eleanor Stoddard, and Moorehouse eventually leaves. This encounter does not resolve Eveline’s attachments, but it places Jerry’s earlier concern within a wider pattern of competing relationships and unfinished conversations. Jerry’s subsequent objection is therefore both personal and interpretive: he sees Moorehouse’s public presence as a bluff, while Eveline remains responsive to the attraction and promise she finds in him.
Confession and Withdrawal
After returning from Armenia and finding Eveline spending much of her time with Moorehouse, Jerry confronts her directly over lunch. He insists that she is being taken in by a publicity agent, then admits that he does not expect her to love him as he loves her. Eveline says she is fond of him, but her reply does not offer the reciprocation he wants. She also reminds him that he himself wrote an article about Moorehouse, complicating Jerry’s attempt to present his judgment as simple insight rather than jealousy.
The conversation moves from argument to an uneasy afternoon together. Eveline says that the war is over and that they are in Paris on a fine winter day; Jerry rejects the comfort of that claim. She studies his intense, reddened face, then pats the back of his hand. The gesture offers care without answering his confession. As they walk through the gardens near the Senate chamber and then through the streets, Eveline decides not to return to her office. Jerry proposes that they play hooky, buys her violets, and orders cognac and seltzer. He considers resigning and writing a book, reviving the earlier hope that he might recover his self-respect through honest work. Eveline questions whether he should give up the opportunity to see the peace conference. She later leaves alone, refusing his offer to accompany her; when she looks back through the café window, he is ordering another drink.
The Parting at the Station
The difference between Jerry’s pursuit and Eveline’s limited response remains visible when she prepares to leave for Nice with Eleanor. Mr. Rasmussen arranges a large dinner at the Gare de Lyon, and Paul Johnson arrives to help with the luggage. Jerry appears drunk and carrying a large bouquet of roses. He jokes about the cold she will find in Nice, while Eleanor corrects his mistaken reference to St. Moritz. The humor eases the scene, but his flowers and unsteady arrival give his farewell a personal intensity distinct from the others’ practical preparations.
As the group hurries for the train, Jerry has no ticket and is left arguing with officials while searching for his press card. Paul helps Eveline with her suitcase and asks her not to stay away too long; she feels she would like to kiss him, but the train is starting. Jerry remains on the platform, unable to join the departing party, while Mr. Rasmussen passes his papers and Jerry’s roses through the window. Eleanor laughs at Eveline’s succession of admirers, and Eveline laughs with her, suggesting that she can treat the romantic complications lightly even when the men involved experience them more painfully. The departure does not establish a final break between Eveline and Jerry, but it gives their relationship a fitting image: he offers flowers and feeling, while she leaves with another companion and no promise to return soon.
Narrative Significance
Jerry’s attachment makes visible a distinction the novel sustains between emotional closeness and mutual desire. Eveline does not dismiss him; she listens to his despair, shares meals and walks with him, tells him she is fond of him, and comforts him with small gestures. Yet those signs of affection do not cancel her independent choices or turn his longing into a reciprocal romance. His sharp judgment of Moorehouse is inseparable from his personal disappointment, while Eveline’s sympathetic attention does not require her to accept Jerry’s preferred future.
The relationship also links private feeling to the wartime and postwar world that shapes their conversations. Jerry’s censorship-bound reporting and anger at profitable war give his desire for a truthful book an urgent professional dimension. Eveline encourages that ambition but does not become the solution to his dissatisfaction. Their scenes repeatedly place intimacy beside interruption: office rounds, cancelled dates, arguments about public figures, a café left for another drink, and a train departure. What remains is not a settled partnership but an unequal bond, sustained by affection and conversation while its central hope goes unanswered.