Gerolamo da Camin and Gorlago
LeilaGerolamo da Camin and Gorlago are lovers in a secretive, non-exclusive relationship, sustained by attachment and sensual attraction but repeatedly strained by jealousy and conflict. Their affair is more than a private entanglement: its concealment shapes Gerolamo’s conduct in his household, while its discovery threatens the reputations of churchmen connected to him and may affect Lelia’s willingness to remain under his roof.
Identity and Circumstances
The narrative establishes the relationship through Gerolamo’s private correspondence and through other characters’ knowledge of the affair. While writing to Gorlago, he refers to her in a series of affectionate pet names and describes himself as miserable in the dullness of the town without her. The letter presents longing and familiarity, but it is not a record of an uninterrupted union: he and Gorlago have recently separated after a quarrel in which her jealousy focused on Teresina.
The narrator gives a less sentimental account of the bond. Gerolamo is strongly drawn to Gorlago’s sensuality, and he finds dismissing her nearly as difficult as bringing Lelia into the same household with her. The two are not faithful to each other, yet they remain attached in their own fashion. They may quarrel fiercely, but separation does not follow. Their relationship therefore combines continuing affection with instability, and erotic attraction with a lack of exclusivity.
Jealousy, Secrecy, and the Household
The episode of Gerolamo writing to Gorlago makes the affair’s secrecy visible in a physical gesture. When Bettina arrives unexpectedly, he has barely time to turn over the note, hiding the letter and displaying an apparently blank page. He then jumps up, distressed by his disordered clothing, and hurriedly buttons his coat. The scene shows his private correspondence and personal disorder abruptly interrupted by a visitor; it does not establish what Gorlago knows about the interruption or how she responds to the letter.
Jealousy has already helped produce the separation that prompted the letter. Gerolamo attributes the rupture to Gorlago’s jealousy concerning Teresina, while his own conduct supplies a broader context for the rivalry: he had previously made licentious advances toward Teresina, who rejected them. When those advances met resistance, he changed his manner toward her, becoming deferential and ingratiating. His private involvement with Gorlago thus sits alongside attempts to manage other women in the household, but the evidence does not make the women’s relationships with one another a shared understanding or alliance.
Gerolamo’s difficulty in combining Gorlago and Lelia under one roof is practical as well as emotional. He believes that Lelia would leave him quickly if Gorlago remained in the house, yet he finds dismissing Gorlago even less possible. This domestic incompatibility constrains his approach to his daughter: his desire to bring Lelia closer cannot be separated from his continuing attachment to Gorlago. The narrative presents no resolution in which he chooses one relationship and ends the other.
Exposure and Reputational Consequences
At a later point, Don Emanuele knows that Gorlago is not in Cantù, as someone might suppose, but in Padova, concealed in Casa Camin. He regards the continuing affair as culpable in itself and especially damaging because it has been conducted without sufficient caution. Its consequences extend beyond Gerolamo and Gorlago: it discredits ecclesiastical acquaintances of the man Don Emanuele identifies as guilty. The affair is therefore secretive, but not entirely unknown; its concealment has failed to prevent its effects from spreading through local religious and social networks.
Don Emanuele also considers what Lelia might do if she learned where Gorlago was. In his view, the discovery would drive Lelia further toward Donna Fedele’s home, the Villino delle Rose. This is Don Emanuele’s expectation, not an outcome confirmed by the account of the affair itself. It nevertheless shows that he treats the relationship as a possible influence on Lelia’s movements and as a factor in the struggle over who will guide her. Gorlago’s presence in Casa Camin and Gerolamo’s attachment to her consequently complicate the father’s efforts to manage his daughter’s future.
Narrative Significance
The relationship exposes the distance between Gerolamo’s public performance and private conduct. When he later speaks to Teresina, he describes himself as unwilling to impose on Lelia and as prepared to give her her property and return to his former life. Yet his private attachment to Gorlago, his inability to dismiss her, and his careful handling of domestic appearances reveal competing claims that his polite presentation does not resolve. The evidence supports a contrast between the fatherly posture he offers and the tangled arrangements of his actual household, rather than a conclusion that every stated intention is simply false.
The affair also functions as a point where private disorder becomes institutionally consequential. Gorlago and Gerolamo may remain bound by affection despite quarrels and infidelity, but the relationship’s carelessness gives Don Emanuele grounds to anticipate reputational damage among clergy and to imagine its effect on Lelia. Their bond is thus neither an uncomplicated romance nor a merely incidental secret: it is an unstable attachment whose concealment, exposure, and domestic consequences shape the pressures surrounding Gerolamo’s family.