Readify

Frieder takes the narrator's file during the conscription examination

Auerhaus

Frieder takes the narrator's file during the conscription examination is a comic raid on the power of official classification: when the conscription board labels the narrator fully fit for service, Frieder exploits a staged search for a bicycle key to steal the file itself. The escape is both practical and theatrical, turning the examination’s solemn procedures into a scene of collective disorder while leaving the narrator’s future briefly open.

The summons and the forced journey

Shortly after Epiphany, a second conscription summons arrives by postcard, instructing the narrator to report for examination in fourteen days. He files it in a folder called “Bummbumm,” beside separate folders for Birth and School. The arrangement gives life’s official milestones a place on a shelf: a birth certificate, school records, and now the paperwork that may determine military service. The narrator’s careful filing is a small irony beside his anarchist identity, which Frieder teases him about, but the joke cannot make the summons disappear.

When the narrator does not report, Bogatzki arrives at the house with an official document ordering the police to take him to the examination. He points out that the narrator has received two summonses and must attend. The narrator had imagined there might be a third, which would let him complete a set in his Bundeswehr folder. Bogatzki drops the formal mode of address and offers a blunt choice: come along or be taken in handcuffs. The threat is not abstract; the handcuffs hang from his belt.

The narrator chooses the handcuffs, partly imagining the school gossip that would follow his arrest. Bogatzki, who evidently has never had to handcuff anyone, fits the metal rings awkwardly and clamps them painfully against the narrator’s bones. He promises to loosen them, then admits he cannot find the key. At the town hall he goes inside and returns half an hour later with it. Vera is allowed to accompany the narrator, and Frieder sets off by bicycle toward Stuttgart after the car carrying them has passed him. The uneasy, improvised escort makes the journey to the Kreiswehrersatzamt feel less like a smooth state procedure than a village spectacle assembled on the fly.

The examination and Frieder’s interruption

Bogatzki waits outside the brown-gray examination building, warning the narrator not to run away. Inside, the same color covers the façade, stairwell, corridors, floors, benches, and officials’ uniforms. Against this drab institutional setting, the narrator is one among many young men being processed, with Vera conspicuously the only woman. The setting makes the examination feel designed to reduce people to interchangeable cases before anyone has decided what those cases mean.

The doctor, a large man in a white coat, studies the narrator’s file and orders him to undress, keeping his underwear on. The narrator objects that he is not ill, but the doctor insists that refusing to cooperate would violate the conscription law. After a long wait, the board announces its decision: by appearance, the narrator is T1, fully fit for service. Officials suggest possible placements in the guard battalion or the paratroopers. The file has done more than record an examination; it has converted a person into a category and made military deployment seem like the category’s natural consequence.

As the narrator and Vera face the board, Frieder suddenly appears in the room asking whether anyone has found his bicycle key. Sweaty from the ride, with damp curls stuck to his head, he insists he must have lost it there. He kneels and puts his cheek to the floor to search beneath the carpet; Vera joins him, feeling behind chair legs. Frieder explains that he must get home because his grandfather, a former prisoner in Siberia, expects lunch on time. The story is so improbable that it nonetheless persuades the officials to help: the suited man slides off his chair, and the group crawls across the floor looking for the key.

The performance keeps the board’s attention below the table. Frieder calls out about the distance, the cold, frozen toes, and five thousand kilometers on foot, repeating that lunch must be served on time. Vera asks whether he has found it. Frieder says yes, thanks everyone, and rushes out, invoking his grandfather as he goes. The officials remain absorbed in the search and its absurd domestic urgency; the narrator and one examiner are the only two who stay seated. Frieder slams the door behind him, and one of the officials concludes that the interruption is over and it is time for lunch.

The stolen file and its meaning

Frieder waits in the stairwell. Back at Auerhaus, he lays a plastic bag on the table and tells the narrator to unpack it. Inside is a cardboard folder bearing the narrator’s name and the federal eagle. Its top sheet says “T1 – fully fit for service”: it is the narrator’s conscription file. The official verdict has not been overturned in the examination room; instead, Frieder has removed the document that carries it into the world beyond that room.

Vera works out how he did it. The suited official had the folder in front of him; once he crawled under the table, the others watched him searching there, while the file lay above. Frieder stayed on the floor long enough to avoid celebrating too soon, comparing the need for caution to winning the lottery while scavengers gather. The stolen papers are thus not simply a prize snatched in a moment of confusion. The prolonged search is the cover that allows the diversion to hold until Frieder can leave with the file hidden beneath his sweater.

Vera proposes putting the document in the freezer, making a joke of the Cold War and turning cold storage into a way to suspend the military future the file represents. The narrator says he will always live at Auerhaus; Frieder answers, “We,” and Vera corrects him: “You.” The exchange places the theft inside the housemates’ life together, but also leaves a difference in their claims to permanence. For the moment, the narrator can return to the shared house rather than carry his classification onward.

Later discovery and consequences

The stolen file does not remain safely buried in the household’s freezer. During the later search, Frieder retrieves it from there, along with the ice cubes, and hands it to a man in a tie. The papers are marked throughout with crossed-out federal eagles, drawn to resemble skewers holding chickens above little campfires. The private joke has become visible evidence: the file combines the narrator’s removal from the military process with Frieder’s deliberate alterations to official documents and state symbols.

The man in the tie identifies theft and suppression of documents under sections 242 and 274 of the Criminal Code. The prosecutor then adds allegations involving denigration of the state and its symbols, forgery, and property damage. The episode’s temporary victory therefore has a cost. Frieder’s trick defeats the immediate machinery of conscription by taking the file out of circulation, but the altered file later helps turn a comic escape into part of the case against the Auerhaus residents.

Narrative significance

The examination scene pits a body, a folder, and an institution against one another. The doctor orders the narrator to undress and cooperate; the board assigns him a fitness category; the file gives that judgment a portable, official form. Frieder’s intervention answers this sequence not with a counter-examination but with distraction, absurd performance, and theft. While the officials’ attention is fixed on the floor, the document that makes the narrator legible to the military disappears.

The humor sharpens rather than erases the stakes. The grandfather’s punctual lunch and the officials’ crawl under the table puncture the board’s authority, while the file’s stark T1 designation shows what the performance interrupts. Yet the later charges reveal that paperwork cannot simply be made harmless by hiding it. The scene links the narrator’s resistance to conscription with the house’s increasingly consequential acts of rule-breaking: the file first seems to offer a way out, then returns as material evidence of the group’s defiance.