Natalist Church
Mickey7The Natalist Church is a religious institution whose doctrine of the unitary soul turns bodily death and technological recreation into questions of personhood. In the colony led by Commander Hieronymus Marshall, its rejection of backup-based life makes Mickey Barnes’s existence as a recreated person—and later as one of two simultaneous Mickeys—an offense against both religious belief and social order. The Church’s importance lies not in a detailed institutional portrait, but in the force its doctrine gives to the human judgment that a copy may look and remember like a person while not truly being one.
Doctrine and the Recreated Body
The doctrine most directly attributed to the Natalist Church is the sanctity of the unitary soul: one soul belongs to one body, and when the original body dies, its soul dies with it. A body produced by a Bio-printer and given a personality from a backup therefore cannot, in this account, continue the original person. It is described as soulless, an abomination, and not fully human. The distinction is not between a convincing copy and an unconvincing one. Mickey’s recreated body carries memories and personality, but the Church’s doctrine treats that continuity as insufficient to establish that the same soul survives.
That position places the Church in direct opposition to the premise of the Expendable system. Mickey describes a life in which death can be followed by another iteration awakening with the previous one’s memories; he also doubts that this makes the new person himself. His uncertainty gives the doctrine an unsettling point of contact with his own experience: the question of whether a backup is genuinely continuous with its predecessor is not resolved simply because the successor remembers having lived the earlier life. But where Mickey’s reflections remain troubled and provisional, the Church’s unitary-soul belief supplies a categorical answer: the original dies, and the recreated person is not that soul.
Marshall and the Colony
The doctrine becomes consequential through Hieronymus Marshall, whom a colonist identifies as a Natalist. Before the colony reaches Niflheim, Marshall learns that Mickey had encountered Darius Blank and interprets the incident as evidence that criminal elements have infiltrated the expedition. The account also connects his religious opposition to people being brought back from the tank, even when there is only one Mickey. During the voyage, he comes close to having Mickey thrown out of an air lock; Mara Singh, captain of the Drakkar and later head of its Engineering Section, reminds him that he does not command the mission until it makes landfall.
This episode shows how religious conviction combines with Marshall’s command concerns. His suspicion of Mickey is not presented as arising from doctrine alone: the Darius Blank incident feeds his fear of criminal infiltration. Yet his Natalism makes Mickey’s very existence an additional offense, so that the dispute cannot be reduced to ordinary discipline or security. The threatened air-lock ejection gives the belief immediate physical stakes for the person it classifies as an abomination.
When Mickey and Mickey8 are both present, the conflict intensifies. Mickey anticipates that Marshall will react badly to there being two Mickey Barneses in the colony, given that he already resents the existence of one. The duplication thus compounds a prior religious objection: if even a single recreated body violates the unitary-soul doctrine, two simultaneous instances make the challenge impossible to treat as an abstract debate. The narrative identifies the danger as a likely response to discovery, not as a Church procedure or formal ruling; the available account does not describe the institution’s hierarchy, membership, or means of enforcing its beliefs.
Multiples and Social Stigma
The Church’s doctrine is also part of a wider cultural revulsion toward multiples. Mickey explains that readers unfamiliar with Natalism or Union history might initially see several copies of an Expendable as useful, especially for a mission requiring two people. The objection, however, is not merely that duplication is technically dangerous or administratively inconvenient. The unitary-soul belief supplies a religious basis for rejecting the premise that multiple bodies can share one person’s identity.
The novel places this belief alongside the history of Alan Manikova and Gault to explain why the reaction extends beyond Church members. Bio-printing existed before the launch of the Ching Shih, but for a long time it could reproduce a body without reliably reproducing consciousness. Early systems scanned and stored bodily patterns; later they could reproduce synaptic connections, yet experiments showed that this was not enough to create the expected consciousness. The bodies produced in those experiments were described as empty, with little awareness or physical capacity. The history establishes that the technology’s ability to copy a body and its ability to preserve a person are not interchangeable questions.
In the aftermath of Manikova’s actions, responsibility is assigned to him rather than to Farhome, but the social stain attaches to multiples. Mickey reports that in much of the Union a multiple is regarded more harshly than a child stealer or a human head collector. That comparison conveys the depth of the taboo; it does not establish that the Natalist Church alone created or administers it. The novel instead distinguishes a doctrinal source of opposition from a broader historical reaction, allowing religious belief and collective memory to reinforce one another without making them identical.
The Doctrine Under Pressure
Mickey’s exchanges with Mickey8 expose the personal cost of treating backup as either unquestioned immortality or simple fraud. After six deaths, Mickey distinguishes the present body from the person who boarded the shuttle from Midgard, then insists to Mickey8 that they are not the same person. He regards the lives each has actually experienced as finite, and doubts that a future Mickey would be him. These conclusions echo the Natalist rejection of continuity through copying, but they arise from Mickey’s fear of his own death rather than from religious authority.
The contrast matters: the Church’s doctrine names the recreated body as soulless, while Mickey’s reasoning emphasizes the loss that memory cannot undo. His account does not settle the metaphysical question of the soul; it makes the consequences of the disagreement concrete. For him, a new body carrying his memories cannot guarantee that the person now facing death will continue to exist. The Natalist Church therefore serves as more than an antagonist to a technology. Its unitary-soul teaching gives religious expression to the novel’s central instability between bodily reproduction, remembered experience, and personal identity, while the public stigma against multiples shows how that instability can become a judgment about who counts as human.


