Readify

The Second Anglo-Afghan War

Shantaram

The Second Anglo-Afghan War is recalled by Abdel Khader Khan as a conflict in which military victories and defeats could not be separated from the history of families, cities, and inherited loyalties. During a pause on a mountain overlooking Kandahar, he traces the British campaign from the Khyber Pass to the siege and relief of the city. His account turns military history into a personal inheritance, while making Kandahar the key to understanding the war around him.

The British advance and Ayub Khan’s campaign

Khader dates the beginning of the war to November 1878, the same month his group began its mission. The British forced their way through the Khyber Pass, and Lord Frederick Roberts captured Kabul, where he imposed martial law. Khader describes the consequences as severe: eighty-seven Afghan soldiers were hanged in a public square, buildings and markets were destroyed, villages were burned, and hundreds of Afghans were killed. In his telling, the campaign’s violence reaches beyond the battlefield into the ordinary places where people lived and traded.

The account also places resistance within Khader’s family history. In June, Prince Ayub Khan announced a jihad to drive out the British and left Herat with ten thousand men. Khader identifies Ayub as an ancestor and says many of his kinsmen served in the army the prince raised. The war is therefore not distant background for him: its military events are bound to the losses and loyalties that shaped his own family. His description of the British as having forced their way into the country underscores the opposing perspectives contained in the story: what one side records as a campaign, the other remembers as an invasion.

Maiwand and the siege of Kandahar

The decisive battle in Khader’s account takes place at Maiwand. The British officer responsible for Kandahar, Burrows, marched out with 1,500 British and Indian soldiers to meet Ayub Khan’s army. Khader describes both sides using cannons, with hundreds killed, and then fighting at close range. The British lost half their number; the Afghans lost 2,500. Despite those losses, the Afghans won, forcing the British back to Kandahar. Ayub then surrounded the city, beginning its siege.

Khader’s attention to the numbers and sequence makes the reversal plain: a British force had advanced into the country, but at Maiwand it was defeated and driven back to a city under threat. The battle’s meaning in his account is not limited to its casualty figures. Maiwand links Ayub’s campaign to the fate of Kandahar, where the war’s immediate stakes became a prolonged contest over whether the British garrison could be relieved.

Roberts’s march and the city’s strategic meaning

Roberts later marched from Kabul with 10,000 men to relieve the siege. Two-thirds of his force were Indian soldiers, whom Khader explicitly recognizes as capable fighters. The march covered 300 miles in twenty-two days, crossing from freezing mountains to burning desert. Khader compares it with the journey he and Lin had made from Chaman: their own passage had taken a month, even with good horses and help from villages. The comparison brings the historical campaign into the present conversation, measuring a famous military march against the hardships of the travelers’ own route.

After twenty days of marching, Roberts’s force fought Ayub Khan’s army and defeated it. Roberts saved the British in Kandahar and became known as Roberts of Kandahar. Yet Ayub escaped; his defeat in this campaign did not end his life. The British subsequently placed Abdul Rahman Khan, a close kinsman of Ayub and another of Khader’s ancestors, on the Afghan throne. Khader says Abdul Rahman ruled with enough wisdom that the British held no real power in Afghanistan, leaving the country’s situation much as it had been before the war. In his account, military intervention produces a change of ruler without securing lasting British control.

Family memory and the war in the present

Khader’s recollection is also shaped by Mackenzie Esquire, his first teacher and friend. Mackenzie taught him the saying Bobs your uncle, which Khader later learned was associated with Roberts. British soldiers had used the phrase because Roberts was kind to them; to Khader, the discovery gave the saying a painful double meaning, since Roberts had killed members of his people. Khader stopped using it. The connection deepened when he learned that Mackenzie’s grandfather had fought in Roberts’s army against Khader’s kinsmen. The two families had inherited opposing sides of the same war, yet Khader recalls Mackenzie as a friend and teacher while men who bore the scars of that conflict were still alive.

This history becomes the frame through which Khader reads the contemporary fighting near Kandahar. From the mountain, he sees the distant city and speaks of fires there as the result of a new war, in which men who had once lived as teachers and merchants were now attacking their own homes, shops, and schools. He argues that Kandahar is the key to Afghanistan: Kabul is its heart, but Kandahar is its soul, and whoever rules Kandahar rules the country. He therefore predicts that the Russians will lose the war only when they are forced to leave the city. The Second Anglo-Afghan War matters in this scene both as a remembered precedent and as a warning that the fate of Kandahar can outlast a single battle or campaign.