GEFFCo
BluebeardGEFFCo is the corporation that commissioned the public display of Rabo Karabekian’s “Windsor Blue Number Seventeen,” a sixty-four-foot wall work installed in its Park Avenue headquarters and later found disintegrating in a sealed basement chamber. The company’s effort to present itself as modern through its art purchase gives way to a more enduring image: eight canvases locked away beneath its building, their paint and tape shedding, until an insurance inspector identified and offered them back to the artist.
Corporate Display and Artistic Prestige
GEFFCo hung “Windsor Blue Number Seventeen” in its headquarters lobby with fanfare, presenting the display as evidence that an old company remained abreast of new developments in both technology and the arts. The painting was exceptionally large, but not the record-breaking masterpiece the company’s publicity staff hoped to claim. At 512 square feet, it was made from eight separate panels held together at the back with C-clamps; other murals in New York City and elsewhere exceeded its dimensions, and the Museum of the City of New York possessed continuous paintings that were taller and a third again as long.
The corporate presentation thus depended on more than the work’s actual scale. Publicists explored whether it could be described as a record-holder for a painting hung on a wall, while sidestepping the complication that it was assembled from separate panels. The episode makes the lobby artwork both a painting and a publicity instrument: GEFFCo sought to make artistic modernity visible in its own premises, but the claim of distinction proved difficult to sustain even on the narrow measure of size.
The Painting and Its Material Failure
The title’s “Windsor Blue” referred to a shade of Sateen Dura-Luxe, an acrylic wall paint used straight from the can. The paint’s advertisements promised colors that would outlast the Mona Lisa’s smile, yet the novel frames that confident promise against the eventual disappearance of the product and the ruin of the work made with it. GEFFCo’s choice to display the painting connected corporate prestige to a material whose advertised permanence did not last.
The work’s history also diverges from the company’s public story. After it had first graced and then disgraced the lobby, the eight panels were left in a locked chamber on the lowest of three basement floors beneath the former GEFFCo Building, later called the Matsumoto Building. There, shreds of paint clung to the canvases. The transformation from celebrated lobby feature to concealed, deteriorating property turns the company’s modern-art display into an unintended record of technological and material failure.
Rediscovery and Return
Three months before Edith’s death, an inspector from Matsumoto’s insurance company was searching the basement for fire hazards when she encountered a locked steel door. No one knew what lay behind it. After obtaining permission to break in, she recognized the canvases from the remnants of Sateen Dura-Luxe and contacted Rabo. She was the first female safety inspector at her company and also its first Black inspector; her identification of the panels brought the lost work back into the artist’s possession.
The return followed years in which GEFFCo’s abandoned lobby picture had become Rabo’s most famous and then most infamous creation. The inspector offered the canvases because she was reluctant to see anything go to waste, while Rabo arranged for a moving and storage company to collect them. The painting’s recovery therefore did not restore its original corporate function or its intact surface. Instead, GEFFCo’s former display returned as eight damaged panels, later placed in the potato barn as part of the stream of visitors touring Rabo’s collection and enormous artwork.
Significance in the Novel
GEFFCo’s role links corporate image-making, the market for art, and the physical life of artworks. The company used the painting to advertise its currency with contemporary culture; Rabo recalls it as a work whose size and fame could be converted into claims of distinction; and its abandonment exposed the vulnerability of the material beneath that prestige. The contrast is sharpened by the promise that the paint would outlast the Mona Lisa: GEFFCo’s modernizing display depended on a product that failed, while the company itself passed into the building’s history under a new name.
The work’s afterlife also shifts the question of who determines its value. GEFFCo first gave it a prominent institutional setting, then left it inaccessible behind a locked basement door. An insurance inspector, not a curator or company publicity office, recognized its significance and made its recovery possible. Later, Rabo included the reconstructed panels’ history in the story told to visitors, treating the large work not simply as a corporate commission or marketable painting but as a defining part of his personal museum and public spectacle.