Shai (Golnar) and Balthasar: Brothers in Opposition
NeverthelessThe relationship between Shai (Golnar) and Balthasar is a concealed family bond turned into a contest for power. The revelation recasts Shai's apparent identity as an exile and ally of Mabel Peloponnese: according to Balthasar's agent, he is Balthasar's missing brother, an heir who has been using other people's loyalties to prepare a challenge to his brother. The account also makes Mabel a point of leverage between them, while leaving the central accusations to be judged through the hostile voice that delivers them.
Identity and Hidden Kinship
For much of Mabel's understanding, Shai is a Navonian exile: a man with a marked neck, barred from the royal city, who needed her help to enter it for a matter of life and death. When the King's Winner identifies him as Golnar, Balthasar's missing brother, Mabel resists the explanation. To her, the mark and the banishment seem to rule out a royal identity. The King's Winner counters that Golnar could not have been marked in Navon because he had never belonged there. The reversal makes the sign Mabel had read as proof of Shai's exile part of a mistaken account of his past.
This revelation does not arrive as a neutral history. It is given by the King's Winner while Mabel is captive, and the language of the disclosure is openly accusatory: he says that Golnar used her to acquire an army and overthrow Balthasar. The distinction matters. The kinship is presented as fact within the scene, but the motives and history attached to it come through an enemy's account, at a moment when he is trying to unsettle Mabel and turn her against Shai.
Rivalry and the Uses of Mabel
The conflict is described as a struggle over rule. The King's Winner says that Golnar manipulated Mabel, the Navon King's Army, and the outlaws calling themselves expatriates, turning them into instruments for dethroning Balthasar and taking his place. In this version, the alliance Mabel understood as a response to danger and a means of helping Shai becomes part of a plan for succession. The disclosure does not establish what Shai himself would say about his aims; it changes the apparent political meaning of the people gathered around him.
Balthasar's interest in Mabel is first registered indirectly. Shai tells Navi Spyridaki that he has heard Balthasar was asking about her, but admits that he does not know why and wants her brought to safety just in case. Later, the King's Winner supplies a reason: he claims Golnar is attached to Mabel and that Balthasar's side intends to exploit that attachment to bring him to Balthasar. Shai's connection to her is thus made both personal and strategically dangerous. The pursuit is not described as a demand for ransom; Mabel is valuable to her captors because of what they believe Shai will do for her.
Mabel herself links the present capture to an earlier pursuit. She asks whether the King's Winner had been after Shai in Tenerife and had been willing to take everyone in his path to catch him. Her question is an inference, not a separately confirmed account of the pursuit. Yet it places the kidnapping within a longer conflict: Mabel suspects she has been caught not for an independent offense, but because she is close to the man Balthasar's agents want to reach.
The Accusation over Gael
The family rivalry becomes more intimate and devastating when the King's Winner announces that Gael is dead and says Golnar killed him. He claims to have been present when Gael was stabbed, describing the death as a betrayal. His testimony gives Mabel a concrete and terrible reason to doubt Shai, but it is still testimony from the captor who has just identified himself as an enemy of Golnar. The scene offers no independent confirmation of the claim before Mabel is forced to absorb it.
The accusation strikes at Mabel's own unresolved feelings about Gael. She recognizes that beneath her curses and punishments she had wanted to keep her brother in her life, and now imagines having to carry her anger and guilt without ever seeing him again. The revelation therefore widens the brothers' conflict beyond a contest over a throne: it threatens Mabel's trust in Shai and turns the fate of her family into another weapon in the struggle. Her horror is intensified by the possibility that her judgment of Shai has been wrong, not simply that the man she trusted may be pursuing power.
An Unresolved Contest
The account leaves the brothers' relationship at a point of dangerous uncertainty. Balthasar is presented as the ruler threatened by a missing heir; Golnar as the brother allegedly assembling forces to displace him; and Mabel as someone whose attachment may be used to draw Golnar into reach. But the explanation comes from the King's Winner, not from either brother in a direct exchange. The book's evidence at this point establishes the revelation and its immediate effect on Mabel, rather than resolving the truth of every charge or the outcome of the brothers' struggle.
That uncertainty is central to the relationship's significance. A hidden kinship changes the meaning of Shai's place among the exiles, while the allegation of manipulation casts doubt on the loyalties that have gathered around him. At the same time, Balthasar's side treats personal attachment as a vulnerability to exploit. The brothers are opposed not only as rivals for power but through the people their conflict draws in: Mabel is made the intended bridge between them, even as the truth of Shai's motives and Gael's death remains contested.