Filemón
DianaFilemón is a shepherd whose long service to Amarilida is nearly undone by jealousy. When she keeps company with Arsileo, who has come searching for Belisa, Filemón mistakes compassion and companionship for evidence of a rival attachment. His suspicions become a public injury as well as a private torment: Amarilida says he has voiced them at gatherings among the shepherds and has left her to escape his own distress. Their dispute is brought before Felismena, whose judgment gives both lovers room to explain how the same events have produced opposite accounts of love, faith, and blame.
Identity and Pastoral Setting
Filemón appears in the pastoral world of shepherds, valleys, flocks, and shared gatherings. Amarilida describes him as having served her from childhood, a history that makes his jealousy more than a passing disagreement: the two have an established bond and a past in which she says she remained faithful to him. The narrative places their quarrel beside the story of Arsileo, who is searching the woods for Belisa, and makes that encounter the immediate occasion for Filemón’s fears.
The landscape frames the dispute without removing it from social life. Felismena asks the pair to sit beneath a green beech beside a flowering meadow so that each can present a case. Their pastoral surroundings offer a place for conversation and judgment, but the conflict has already travelled beyond private feeling. Amarilida says Filemón has made his suspicions known at festivals, dances, and wrestling contests among the shepherds, where accusation can threaten her standing as well as their intimacy.
Jealousy and Separation
Filemón explains that Arsileo’s arrival, five or six months earlier, unsettled the relationship. Arsileo was searching for Belisa, who had been driven into the woods after a misfortune. Amarilida, moved by pity or by some reason of her own, would not leave his company. Filemón says that whenever he complained, her response seemed so angry that it confirmed his sense of being wronged. His love, he says, filled his heart, while jealousy filled his understanding; he watched the two closely and read danger into their continued companionship.
Amarilida contests both his inference and its consequences. She says she rejected other shepherds who sought her because of her regard for Filemón, and argues that the devotion she had shown him should have counted against the suspicion that she would turn to Arsileo. She denies that Arsileo spoke to her in the language of love or that she answered him in kind. In her account, she stayed near him to console someone suffering from a grave sorrow and even urged him to go in search of Belisa. What Filemón treats as evidence of infidelity, she presents as compassion witnessed and misjudged.
The quarrel leads to Filemón’s departure from the valley. Amarilida says he chose absence in the belief that it would cure his suffering, but that his leaving diminished the happiness between them rather than ending his pain. His suspicions had already cooled her affection; his public complaints compounded the hurt by placing her honor under pressure. She says she no longer wishes to risk being subjected to false conjectures. Their separation thus follows not from a proved rival love but from Filemón’s interpretation of an uncertain situation and the injury that interpretation causes.
The Case Each Lover Makes
Filemón does not deny Amarilida’s goodness or discretion, and he concedes that these qualities should clear her of suspicion. He nevertheless insists that jealousy does not require certainty: suspicions, rather than proofs, are what torment a lover. He believes that her prolonged friendship with Arsileo gave him grounds for fear, even if she had never exchanged words of love with him. His defense reveals the contradiction at the heart of his position: he acknowledges that Amarilida’s conduct can be understood as innocent, yet treats the possibility of betrayal as sufficient reason to accuse her.
He also presents his departure as an attempted remedy, not a punishment. He says that he left to see whether distance from the person who caused him pain might ease it and to prevent his importunities from troubling Amarilida. But he turns the failure of that remedy into another grievance: her affection, he argues, should have survived his absence, and its decline gives him further reason to complain. His reasoning makes separation both a response to jealousy and a fresh test of Amarilida’s devotion, a test she had no part in choosing.
Amarilida’s account reverses that logic. She maintains that she had shown constancy by refusing other suitors, while Filemón’s repeated watching and suspicion failed to credit what she had actually said and done. She does not claim that his love was feigned; rather, she objects that his love has become a source of unjust judgment. The dispute therefore turns on what counts as fidelity: Filemón demands reassurance against imagined possibilities, while Amarilida asks that his trust be guided by her demonstrated conduct.
Mediation and Reconciliation
Felismena acts as judge, first hearing Filemón’s plea and then Amarilida’s answer. Her intervention is not presented as a formal verdict that proves one account and dismisses the other. Instead, the hearing brings the costs of Filemón’s suspicions into view and lets him answer the specific complaint that his behavior has caused. He acknowledges Amarilida’s goodness and discretion, then appeals to her clemency and to the faith he has always placed in her.
His words end in tears. Those tears, together with Felismena’s entreaties, soften Amarilida, and the lovers are reconciled. Filemón resolves not to do again anything that might give Amarilida cause to complain of him. The ending restores their affection but does not erase the terms of the conflict: their reunion follows his recognition that suspicion has damaged the bond he meant to defend.
Narrative Role
Filemón’s episode gives the pastoral work a compact portrait of love undone not by confirmed betrayal but by the treatment of uncertainty as proof. His devotion is real, yet its expression becomes surveillance, public complaint, and withdrawal; Amarilida’s fidelity is likewise real, but cannot protect her from being misread. The mediation scene turns a private lovers’ quarrel into a contest of explanations, where the difference between what happened and what Filemón feared becomes decisive.
His reconciliation also contrasts with the more painful love stories surrounding the shepherds. Here, separation can be reversed when Filemón hears Amarilida’s account, admits the force of her character, and changes his conduct. The episode does not suggest that jealousy itself guarantees faithfulness. Instead, it shows how the language of devoted love may either sustain a relationship or injure it, depending on whether the lover trusts the other’s words and actions.

