Harry S. Truman’s reputation revival
TrumanHarry S. Truman’s reputation revival was a gradual change in public judgment, not simply a belated response to one book or one visit abroad. It took shape in Independence, where neighbors welcomed him home as a fellow citizen; in reviews that reconsidered his presidency through his Memoirs; and in European acclaim that made him a conspicuous ambassador for the United States. By the time of his death, even publications that had once scorned him were celebrating him as a major figure of the century.
A Change in the Public Mood
The shift was visible to Truman in the mail. He observed, “The tone of my mail has changed completely. It still comes in by the bushel but there’s hardly a mean one in two hundred….” The volume of correspondence had not diminished, but its character had changed: the hostility that had marked so much of his public life had given way to a much more favorable response.
The welcome in Independence made that change tangible. Cars and sightseeing buses traveled slowly past the Trumans’ home on North Delaware Street, while a sign at the depot identified the town as the home of the thirty-third President. Truman, attentive to historical accuracy, objected: because Cleveland had served two nonconsecutive terms, he considered himself the thirty-second president. The correction was characteristic, but the attention itself testified to his altered standing. Most townspeople were pleased that the Trumans had come home to stay and admired the modest way they resumed life among their neighbors. An old friend who had once said that Truman lived around the corner now found himself telling people that they lived around the corner from Truman.
That affection was not universal; some residents, mainly Republicans, still thought no better of him. But they were a minority in a town whose pride rested partly on his refusal to act like a distant celebrity. His restored local standing did not erase political disagreement. It made his ordinary, accessible presence part of the account of who he was.
The Memoirs and a Reassessment of the Presidency
The publication of Truman’s Memoirs gave this changing regard a more durable public form. Reviewers treated the first volume as a substantial account of American political life at its highest level. They praised its detail, its clarity, its attention to presidential power, and the combination of modesty and confidence they found in its author. Allan Nevins judged it a distinguished volume and used his review to assess not only the book but the President: Truman, he argued, had grown in office and brought historical knowledge, energy, and courage to major crises.
The praise came with reservations. Some reviewers wanted more autobiography and less of the official-paper quality they thought had entered the book through the many people involved in its preparation. Richard Rovere missed Truman’s characteristic, pungent voice and pointed to the letters to his mother as a more vivid glimpse of him as a person. The account had, in important stretches, been made more uniform than its subject. Truman himself had agreed to a process that helped produce that effect, and appears to have regarded the project chiefly as a record of history rather than a telling of his personal story.
Comparisons with Winston Churchill’s history of the war did not make the book a literary landmark, but they did not cancel its achievement. Nevins called it a volume of distinction, while emphasizing Truman’s conception of the presidency and his effort to live up to it. The book’s importance to the revival lay partly in this change of emphasis: judgments about a supposedly commonplace politician could now be reconsidered alongside a detailed account of presidential responsibility and the decisions made under pressure.
The response was not confined to the first volume. The accompanying series in Life and the next volume of the Memoirs renewed interest in Truman and encouraged a reassessment of his presidency. His account also provoked rebuttals from major participants, including Jimmy Byrnes and Henry Wallace. That controversy showed that the books had entered an active argument about the past rather than closing it. Their publication nevertheless marked the beginning of a steady revival in Truman’s reputation and, in the narrative of his later life, the opening of an exceptionally happy period.
Recognition at Home and Abroad
Independence’s most generous gesture was the donation of Slover Park as the site for the presidential library. The thirteen-acre park stood about a mile from the Trumans’ home, making it accessible to the town and, to Truman, more appropriate than using valuable family land in Grandview. He was delighted by the offer. The library’s proposed location joined his renewed national prominence to the place where he had returned to live: a national institution would stand within walking distance of his neighborhood.
The European tour brought another kind of recognition. At Chartwell, Lord Beaverbrook told Truman that he had made the greatest ambassador of goodwill America had ever had; similar praise followed during the journey. An American reporter heard a spectator remark, “Too bad he’s not campaigning for anything in this country,” before adding, “He’d win any election.” British headlines called the visit the “Truman Triumph,” and one newspaper described him as a living symbol of what people liked best about the United States. The welcome rested not on a new office or a campaign, but on the impression made by the former President himself. He charmed European audiences by being himself, and the reception extended the revival beyond the domestic audience whose judgment had begun to change.
The Revival’s Legacy
The later acclaim gathered together judgments that had once been more sharply divided. At Truman’s death, tributes in print, on the air, in Congress, and abroad remembered him as a figure of courage and principle. Even Time and The Wall Street Journal, both of which had often scorned him, now acclaimed him as one of the great figures of the century.
The praise connected his reputation to decisions and institutions that had helped define his presidency: facing the question of whether to use the atomic bomb, creating the United Nations, announcing the Truman Doctrine, supporting the Marshall Plan and the Berlin Airlift, recognizing Israel, helping establish NATO, committing American forces in Korea, and upholding civilian control of the military. This retrospective recognition did not mean every dispute had disappeared; the controversies stirred by his Memoirs remained part of the record. Rather, the revival made it possible to see the controversies alongside the scale of his responsibilities and the consequences of his choices. Its defining reversal was that the ordinary-seeming President once dismissed by many critics came to be remembered, at home and abroad, for the courage and judgment he brought to extraordinary decisions.


