Iroquois
BarkskinsThe Iroquois occupy an uneasy place in the novel’s colonial history: they are repeatedly invoked as a military danger, yet the fears attached to them are conveyed largely through settler narration and inherited stories. Their role reaches beyond the threat of violence. It shows how colonial rivalry turns Indigenous peoples into enemies in European accounts even as French authorities depend on Indigenous allies and disregard their claims to land and security.
Identity and Colonial Reputation
In recounting his past to René Sel, Monsieur Trépagny describes travelling with his brothers first along the Saguenay River to trade furs with the Hurons, and later with the Odaawa, while avoiding the Iroquois, whom he says favored the English. He characterizes them as people trained from childhood to endure torture and to inflict pain. This is Trépagny’s account, not an impartial description: it casts the Iroquois as a terrifying contrast to the French trading relationships he presents as prudent and familiar.
Trépagny’s history also makes clear that the fur trade involved long, exhausting journeys rather than a simple exchange. He recalls carrying heavy packs over six- or eight-mile portages and hauling cumbersome kettles. His account is centered on his own aversion to that labor and injury, but the Iroquois remain part of its political backdrop: he describes avoiding them while French traders sought commercial relationships elsewhere. In this telling, Indigenous nations enter the story through the routes, alliances, and threats perceived by French traders.
Fear in the Forest
Years of hearing Trépagny describe supernatural dangers have altered René’s sense of the forest. On a journey through the woods, René fears that an unseen presence is near. The Iroquois are far to the south and west, but he has heard that raiding parties sometimes pass through the forest unseen and massacre settlers. That knowledge, mixed with stories of forest spirits and the possible danger of animals, makes the woods feel threatening even before René has evidence of anyone nearby.
After hearing a twig break, René sees demonic faces in the branches and imagines that he may never return to Trépagny’s clearing or claim his land. He smells smoke and believes it comes from an Iroquois fire. Rather than light a fire himself, he spends a shivering night beneath the larches, listening for pursuers. At dawn he decides that flight will not help; he takes a position behind a spruce and waits, prepared to face what he believes will be capture and death. The scene shows how accounts of Iroquois raids have become part of René’s imagination, shaping his physical experience of the forest and his hopes of becoming a landholder.
The encounter that follows reverses his expectation. He hears French speech and laughter, steps onto the trail, and finds two voyageurs, the long-awaited brothers of Monsieur Trépagny, rather than Iroquois attackers. The relief does not make René’s fear baseless within his world; it reveals how a danger he has learned to anticipate can govern his choices even when the immediate evidence points elsewhere.
Violence and Competing Powers
The threat is not merely imagined. Elphège later tells René that Iroquois women killed Monsieur Trépagny after his capture, in an act of vengeance associated with the larger conflict. Elphège asks René not to tell Mari, believing the news would make her suffer. René cannot bring himself to report the painful circumstances of Trépagny’s death to her. The episode establishes the Iroquois as actors in the violence of the colonial frontier, but the information reaches the reader through Elphège’s account, after the event, and within a chain of personal silence and grief.
The novel sets such stories against the ambitions of the French and British empires. In a conversation about Indigenous suffering, Père Crème argues that Indigenous people love their country and children, and that France is taking their land and corrupting their children through goods and coercive practices. He also notes that the French use them as fighters when their territory and the fort at Louisbourg are threatened by the English. The passage makes a revealing contrast: colonial authorities can treat Indigenous people as strategically necessary allies while denying the force of their attachment to their own lands and lives. The Iroquois’ association with the English belongs to this contested political landscape, not to a neutral division between inherently hostile peoples.
Land, Displacement, and the Wider Indigenous World
The Iroquois are named within a story of alliances, rivalries, and displacement that extends beyond them. When Theotiste plans to join the diverse community of refugees at Odanak, his intended destination is described as a gathering of Mi’kmaq, Abenaki, Sokoki, Cowasucks, Penobscots, Androscoggins, Missisquois, and others. The setting underscores that colonial conflict and territorial loss affect many Indigenous peoples, whose movements cannot be reduced to a single opposition between French settlers and the Iroquois.
Later, Sosep reminds returning Mi’kmaq that the French king has given their land to the British. Theotiste answers that the land is theirs, not the French king’s to give. In another reflection on encroachment, Sosep explains that settlers’ animals damage Indigenous food sources, their boats and nets take fish, and introduced plants displace local ones. He warns that the settlers are many while his people are few, and urges the Mi’kmaq to keep their own world of reciprocal relationships among people, plants, animals, and birds alive. These scenes do not describe Iroquois actions directly, but they provide the political frame in which the novel’s accounts of Indigenous conflict must be read: European claims to territory and authority threaten Indigenous communities across the region.
Narrative Significance
The Iroquois’ narrative presence is often mediated by others: Trépagny’s recollections, René’s fear, and Elphège’s later account of a death. This mediation matters. The novel shows how reputation can travel ahead of a people, shaping what a French settler expects to see in the forest, while the larger colonial order is itself built on competing claims and violence. René’s mistaken identification of the voyageurs makes that process visible: a learned fear becomes immediate experience, then yields to recognition.
The novel also refuses to let the Iroquois’ role stand alone as a tale of Indigenous violence. It places that violence alongside imperial rivalry, the use of Indigenous fighters by France, and the ongoing dispossession of the Mi’kmaq and other peoples. In this broader view, the Iroquois are neither a decorative symbol of wilderness nor a complete explanation for frontier danger. Their presence marks a contested political world in which Indigenous nations act, suffer, form alliances, and face expanding colonial power.