Weizi
AnalectsWeizi is an official who withdrew from the court at the end of the Yin dynasty and one of three men whom Confucius identifies as possessing virtue. The brief account gives no further biography or explanation of his decision; its force lies in placing his withdrawal beside two radically different responses to the same court’s crisis.
Identity and the court crisis
Weizi appears in a compressed catalogue of three responses to political danger. He withdrew from the court, while Jizi became a slave to Zhou and Bi Gan remonstrated with the ruler and died. The text does not say what Weizi did after leaving, or specify the circumstances of his departure. It presents the withdrawal itself as the defining fact of his part in the crisis.
Three responses, one moral judgment
The contrast among the three men is sharp: Weizi leaves, Jizi endures enslavement, and Bi Gan confronts the ruler through remonstrance at the cost of his life. Confucius gathers these unlike actions under a single judgment, calling all three men virtuous. In this framing, virtue is not reduced to one prescribed tactic. Withdrawal, survival under degradation, and fatal protest can each carry moral weight, even though the account offers no grounds for ranking them or claiming that the men shared a motive.
Narrative role and limits
Weizi’s significance is established through juxtaposition rather than an unfolding personal story. His departure opens the triad, but the record supplies no speech, description, or later consequence for him. That restraint makes the grouping itself central: the brief passage preserves three distinct fates as examples of virtue, while leaving Weizi’s particular reasoning unstated.