The Ideological Conflict: Nekhludoff vs. Rogozhinsky

Resurrection

The heated debate between Nekhludoff and his brother-in-law about land ownership, law, and morality, highlighting the clash between idealism and pragmatism.

increasingupBearing stren­gth in each eventdowndecreasing
The Visit to NathalieThe Visit to Nathalie
The Visit to Nathalie The Sister's Concern Nathalie, Nekhludoff's sister, visits him at his hotel. She is worried about his plans to marry a convict and give away his land. Her husband, Rogozhinsky, a conservative judge, accompanies her. The Discussion of the Land Rogozhinsky questions Nekhludoff's decision to give land to the peasants. He argues that such actions are foolish and dangerous. Nekhludoff defends his principles, citing the injustice of private property. The Rising Tension The conversation becomes heated. Nekhludoff accuses the legal system of serving class interests. Rogozhinsky is offended, and the two men part in anger. Nathalie is caught in the middle, upset by the conflict.
The Debate on the LawThe Debate on the Law
The Debate on the Law The Purpose of Law Rogozhinsky insists that law exists to protect society and punish evil. Nekhludoff counters that law is a tool of the ruling class to maintain its power. He cites examples of innocent people being punished. The Personal Attack Rogozhinsky, feeling personally attacked, defends his career as a judge. He accuses Nekhludoff of being an impractical dreamer. The debate becomes a clash of worldviews, with no resolution. The Aftermath Nekhludoff leaves, feeling guilty for hurting his sister. He realizes that such conflicts are inevitable when one tries to live by conscience in an unjust society. The rift with his family is another price of his awakening.
In Moscow, before leaving for Siberia
Later that evening