The Blitz on London
TrumanThe Blitz on London was the sustained German air assault on the British capital during the Battle of Britain in 1940, a campaign meant to break the will of the British people that instead made their suffering an urgent argument over how the United States should respond to Nazi aggression. The narrative places the raids against an image of aerial war that had once seemed imaginary: young Harry S. Truman had copied lines from Tennyson’s “Locksley Hall” in high school and still carried them folded in his wallet. The imagined air fleets had become real, and the destruction was worse than the poem’s forecast.
The Battle Reaches London
The first great air battle in history began in July 1940, as Hitler’s Luftwaffe crossed the Channel day after day to bomb British ports, airfields, and London. The Royal Air Force’s Spitfires and Hurricanes rose to meet them. On September 7, an unprecedented force of 375 German bombers attacked London. Night raids followed, bringing incendiary fires whose scale and human consequences reached American audiences through correspondents’ dispatches and radio reports.
Edward R. Murrow’s broadcast from London gave listeners a witness’s account of the fires. He described watching them flare and die away, then reflected on the puniness of the effort to burn a great city. The account sets the scale of destruction beside the resilience of the place the attackers meant to devastate: the fires were immense, but they had not made London’s destruction a completed fact.
December 29 and the Arsenal of Democracy
Hitler boasted that the air Blitz would break the English people’s will. On Sunday, December 29, London endured its most savage bombing yet, with more than a thousand fires raging across the city. That same night in Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt was wheeled into the White House’s oval-shaped Diplomatic Reception Room to address the nation by radio. The juxtaposition is central to the event’s significance: while London burned, the president argued that the conflict threatened far more than the city under attack.
Roosevelt said the Nazis sought to enslave the world and warned that stroking a tiger would not make it a kitten. He described American civilization as facing grave peril and called for massive production to supply countries under Nazi attack—not for a declaration of war. His appeal, remembered as the “Arsenal of Democracy” speech, made London’s emergency a test of whether the United States would help nations fighting the aggressor before the war reached America directly.
The Debate over Aid
On January 6, 1941, Harry S. Truman listened at a joint session of Congress as Roosevelt made a further appeal on behalf of countries defending the Four Freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. Truman regarded Roosevelt as being at his best. Days later, Roosevelt proposed Lend-Lease, which would send arms to Britain on credit, and a fierce congressional fight began.
Isolationist senators—including Burton K. Wheeler, Arthur Vandenberg, Bennett Clark, Gerald P. Nye, and Robert Taft—argued that aid to Britain would draw the United States toward war. Wheeler, Truman’s former mentor, warned that the measure would “plow under every fourth American boy.” Roosevelt called that the “rottenest thing” said in public life in his generation. Truman judged Wheeler, Clark, and their allies profoundly mistaken and shortsighted. Clark, a favorite of the America First movement, praised Charles A. Lindbergh and opposed both aid to Britain and further American involvement, arguing that the country should defend itself rather than spend supplies in Europe.
Significance in the Narrative
The Blitz’s place in the account extends beyond the destruction of London. Its chronology turns the bombing into the immediate backdrop for Roosevelt’s effort to mobilize American production and for the political struggle over whether helping Britain was a step toward war. The same night’s contrast—more than a thousand fires in London, a radio appeal from Washington—makes the distance between witnessing an attack and deciding how to answer it a central tension.
The episode also gives concrete force to the shift in Truman’s judgment. He had listened to Roosevelt’s appeal for the Four Freedoms, then saw the Lend-Lease proposal meet fierce resistance from men whose arguments he considered dangerously shortsighted. The raids did not by themselves settle the American debate, but the narrative presents them alongside the debate’s turning point: Britain’s need became not an abstraction but a daily emergency, and the question of supplying it became a test of American policy.