Christopher Waldrop
DopesickChristopher Waldrop is Jamie Waldrop’s younger son and one of two Waldrop children who became addicted, first to pills and then to heroin. His story moves through treatment, bereavement, relapse, and a later period of sustained sobriety. It also shows how addiction reaches beyond the person using drugs: Christopher’s choices brought severe financial and emotional costs to his family, while his recovery depended on both his own decision to change and support his family could afford to provide.
Identity and Background
Christopher and Colton Banks were friends who used drugs together. Their paths had crossed through friends at North Cross, a private suburban school Christopher attended. The families’ circumstances offered no simple protection against addiction. Jamie Waldrop was a civic leader married to a prominent surgeon, and Christopher’s addiction became part of a family crisis that unfolded inside a life of professional and financial privilege.
Jamie did not initially understand the depth of her sons’ addiction. She discovered each of them passed out in separate incidents at home: Christopher was found on a bathroom floor amid signs of heroin use. These episodes made addiction visible in the household, but they were only part of a longer pattern that included treatment attempts, relapse, and the need to manage the consequences of his drug use.
Addiction, Treatment, and Its Costs
Christopher’s family tried outpatient Suboxone programs, none of which they considered successful, as well as several residential rehabilitation and aftercare sober-house programs. Two residential and aftercare efforts eventually proved helpful. Across the sons’ treatment, the Waldrops spent more than $300,000, not including drug-related legal expenses or thousands of dollars in stolen checks and credit-card charges for gift cards that were exchanged with dealers for drugs. Jamie explained that a $200 gift card could be traded for $120 worth of pills. Christopher also stole and pawned property, actions that made the family’s attempts to support him inseparable from the financial damage addiction caused.
The disruption reached into ordinary family life. During a medical conference at the Greenbrier, Jamie and her husband brought their grown sons because they did not trust them to remain home alone; while there, they found a substantial drug stash hidden in a potted plant in their room. Jamie also concealed the jewelry that remained after pieces went missing, moving it among an oatmeal container, the freezer, and a laundry hamper. These precautions convey how long the household adapted itself around the possibility of theft and drug use. For years, concealment and vigilance became part of what the family regarded as normal.
Colton Banks’s Death and the Threat of Relapse
Christopher was two weeks into his first residential-treatment stay when he learned that Colton had died after taking oxycodone pills and other narcotics. Christopher remembered him as a kind friend who would get out of bed to give someone a ride in the middle of the night. The death gave Christopher’s treatment a deeply personal context: the person who had shared his drug use was gone while he was beginning rehabilitation.
The circumstances of Colton’s death also exposed the wider chain surrounding their drug use. Colton’s body was found at the home of a middle-aged opioid user who had recently received hundreds of pills from a Roanoke pain clinic. A police search warrant established that all but twelve of those pills were missing. Colton had been selling pills at Radford University to repay a drug debt incurred the day before. His death was therefore both a personal loss for Christopher and a consequence of a supply-and-debt cycle in which young people could be pulled from using drugs into selling them.
The following Mother’s Day, Christopher was visiting Jamie after leaving an Asheville aftercare program against his counselor’s advice. He had been sober for four months but said he was tired of the rules and wanted to drink again. Jamie, who feared he was close to relapse, asked Drenna Banks to speak with him. Drenna invoked Colton’s death and the uncertainty it had imposed on Colton’s family. Christopher maintained that he was not using heroin and hoped eventually to make Colton proud, but the drinking was followed by poor decisions, stolen checks, pawned laptops, and continued denial to Jamie over the phone.
A Return to Treatment and a Change in Resolve
When Jamie went to Christopher’s apartment, she found beer and a bong in the living room and asked to see his phone. His text log showed repeated communication with drug dealers; heroin and needles were also present among his belongings. The discovery ended the possibility that reassurance alone could settle her concerns. Christopher later returned to heroin use, and Jamie changed the terms of her help: she would no longer finance his apartment, car, cellphone, or food.
Instead, Jamie stayed for a week in an Asheville hotel with her son as he went through withdrawal and prepared to return to rehabilitation. A day into that process, Christopher decided he was ready to try again. At twenty, he connected his renewed willingness to his grief over Colton, the hurt he had caused his family, and exhaustion with stealing to fund his drug use. Most importantly, he wanted sobriety for himself. The change in his stated purpose marks a distinction between treatment undertaken amid family pressure and recovery he had begun to claim as his own.
Recovery, Family Support, and Narrative Significance
As of the book’s writing, Christopher had remained sober for four years. At twenty-four, he was back in college in Dallas, after having gone to Montana to live in a sober house for young men moving from rehabilitation into recovery. On his twenty-first birthday, when a waitress offered him a drink, he told her he was allergic to alcohol. The episode expresses his abstinence through a brief social refusal rather than a dramatic confrontation; it also follows a recovery that had already included relapse and renewed treatment.
Christopher spent time helping the recovery community, mentoring newly sober young people and helping them work through the twelve steps. At the same time, he worried about Jamie, whose efforts to help others increasingly involved calling rehabilitation programs, collecting people from the streets, and taking them to homeless shelters. His surgeon father sometimes gave Jamie’s cellphone number to addicted patients he encountered in the emergency room. Christopher recognized both the value and the emotional cost of her commitment. He worried that she did not fully grasp that people she helped might die or relapse, particularly when they could not afford repeated rehabilitation and aftercare.
His own recovery underscores that disparity. Jamie could pay for another $30,000 rehabilitation stay and accompany him on a flight to Montana so he would not change his mind at the last moment. Christopher’s account of sobriety therefore does not present recovery as a matter of resolve alone: it includes his decision to pursue it, the family’s capacity to finance continued care, and the sustained support available to him afterward. His later work with newly sober people extends that experience outward, even as his concern for his mother shows that recovery did not erase the strain his family had endured.


