Unperson
In the dystopian society of Oceania, an "unperson" is an individual who has been not only executed but also erased from all records, memories, and history, so that they are treated as if they had never existed. This concept represents the ultimate exercise of the Party's power over reality, ensuring that even the memory of dissent is obliterated.
Definition and Mechanism
To become an unperson is to undergo a complete social and historical annihilation. The Party's system of purges and vaporisations ensures that the names of those who have fallen out of favour are removed from all documents, including newspapers, committee lists, and official registers. Any reference to them is deleted, and their existence is denied. The term "unperson" itself appears in bureaucratic shorthand: when a file is marked "refs unpersons," it means the person is not only dead but has been rendered nonexistent in all records. The process is a routine part of government, as purges eliminate not only individuals but also the memory of them.
Key Examples
A specific case is that of Comrade Withers, an Inner Party member once singled out for praise in Big Brother's Order for the Day and awarded the Order of Conspicuous Merit. Within months, the organisation he led was dissolved, and Withers was designated an "unperson." His name was erased from all records, and his past achievements were rewritten to eliminate his existence. The cryptic instruction "refs unpersons" in the orders received by the Records Department confirmed that he was not only dead but had never existed. This case demonstrates the routine process by which the Party erases individuals from history.
Significance
The unperson is the ultimate expression of the Party's power to control reality. By obliterating all traces of a person, the Party demonstrates that the past is entirely malleable. This process is not limited to physical death but extends to historical death, ensuring that no dissident can become a martyr or inspire future resistance. The Party's complete control over records and memories, as seen in the routine falsification of statistics and news, makes the unperson a tool for maintaining ideological purity. In contrast, the proles, who are ignored by the Party, have retained a capacity for human loyalty and emotion that the Party has not been able to destroy. The unperson, however, is a being entirely stripped of such qualities, a warning of the fate awaiting those who challenge the Party's supremacy.


